Compare
Shoal Point - Bucasia vs Slade Point
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Shoal Point - Bucasia profile · Slade Point profile
Shoal Point - Bucasia Slade Point
Shoal Point - Bucasia and Slade Point are two nearby Queensland areas with different levels of amenity and wealth. Shoal Point - Bucasia is a more affluent area, where the typical weekly household income is $2,085, compared to $1,536 in Slade Point. It also has larger homes, with 44.3% having four bedrooms, while Slade Point has more three-bedroom homes. In contrast, Slade Point is more walkable; 56.6% of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of a local center, compared to just 20.0% in Shoal Point - Bucasia. Slade Point also has more people of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent, at 14.0% compared to 6.8% in Shoal Point - Bucasia.
Since 2011, the gaps between the two areas have generally widened. Residents in Slade Point are now noticeably older, with a typical age of 40 compared to 36 in Shoal Point - Bucasia. The income gap has also grown, with Shoal Point - Bucasia seeing more households earning over $3,000 a week. Despite these diverging trends, the two areas remain similar in other ways. They have almost identical proportions of detached houses, similar rental rates, and nearly the same share of people who work from home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,343
- First area, 2016: 5,747
- First area, 2021: 6,084
- Second area, 2011: 3,859
- Second area, 2016: 3,349
- Second area, 2021: 3,455
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Slade Point: 0.4% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Slade Point: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Slade Point: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Slade Point: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Slade Point: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Slade Point: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Slade Point: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.8% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Slade Point: 3.5% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Slade Point: 3.0% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Slade Point: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Slade Point: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Slade Point: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Slade Point: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Slade Point: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Slade Point: 3.2% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Slade Point: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in Slade Point: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Slade Point: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $814
- First area, 2016: $761
- First area, 2021: $940
- Second area, 2011: $676
- Second area, 2016: $623
- Second area, 2021: $781
- First area, 2011: $1,894
- First area, 2016: $1,727
- First area, 2021: $2,085
- Second area, 2011: $1,474
- Second area, 2016: $1,258
- Second area, 2021: $1,536
- First area, 2011: $2,083
- First area, 2016: $2,001
- First area, 2021: $2,316
- Second area, 2011: $1,672
- Second area, 2016: $1,456
- Second area, 2021: $1,904
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $2,200
- First area, 2016: $2,080
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Shoal Point - Bucasia with nearby areas
Compare Slade Point with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Shoal Point - Bucasia vs Slade Point [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/312021354/shoal-point-bucasia/vs/312021355/slade-point