Compare
Marsden vs Woodridge
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.2 km apart · Marsden profile · Woodridge profile
Marsden Woodridge
Marsden and Woodridge are neighbouring areas in Logan with distinct housing and social patterns. Marsden is a younger area where the typical resident is 28, and homes tend to be larger, with 89.2% having three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Woodridge has an older typical resident aged 33 and a higher proportion of people living alone at 30.8%. While Woodridge has much better walkability — with 97.2% of homes in a 15-minute-city walkshed compared to 59.7% in Marsden — Marsden has a higher typical weekly household income of $1,413, compared to $1,043 in Woodridge.
Everyday life is similar in both places when it comes to the number of businesses, the share of adults with a bachelor degree, and the amount of unpaid care provided. However, some gaps are widening. The difference in the number of children under 15 has grown to 4.9 percentage points, and the gap in typical ages has increased since 2011. While both areas sit below the national figure for typical income, the gap between them has narrowed slightly over the last decade.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,489
- First area, 2016: 14,447
- First area, 2021: 15,988
- Second area, 2011: 12,787
- Second area, 2016: 12,579
- Second area, 2021: 12,982
- First area, 2011: 27 yrs
- First area, 2016: 28 yrs
- First area, 2021: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Marsden: 0.1% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Woodridge: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Marsden: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Woodridge: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Marsden: 0.6% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Woodridge: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Marsden: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Woodridge: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Marsden: 1.3% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Woodridge: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Marsden: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 60–64 in Woodridge: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
- 55–59 in Marsden: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Woodridge: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Marsden: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 50–54 in Woodridge: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Marsden: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Woodridge: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Marsden: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Woodridge: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Marsden: 3.5% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Woodridge: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Marsden: 3.4% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Woodridge: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Marsden: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 25–29 in Woodridge: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Marsden: 3.9% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Woodridge: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 15–19 in Marsden: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 15–19 in Woodridge: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Marsden: 4.9% males, 4.5% females; 10–14 in Woodridge: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in Marsden: 5.0% males, 4.6% females; 5–9 in Woodridge: 4.0% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Marsden: 4.9% males, 4.1% females; 0–4 in Woodridge: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $542
- First area, 2016: $579
- First area, 2021: $633
- Second area, 2011: $411
- Second area, 2016: $458
- Second area, 2021: $510
- First area, 2011: $1,201
- First area, 2016: $1,322
- First area, 2021: $1,413
- Second area, 2011: $805
- Second area, 2016: $937
- Second area, 2021: $1,043
- First area, 2011: $1,235
- First area, 2016: $1,339
- First area, 2021: $1,473
- Second area, 2011: $889
- Second area, 2016: $1,031
- Second area, 2021: $1,197
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.3
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $345
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $250
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $280
- First area, 2011: $1,700
- First area, 2016: $1,524
- First area, 2021: $1,470
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,267
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Marsden with nearby areas
Compare Woodridge with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Marsden vs Woodridge [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/311031317/marsden/vs/311061336/woodridge