Compare
Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve vs Marsden
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 7.6 km apart · Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve profile · Marsden profile
Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve Marsden
Marsden and Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve are neighbouring areas with very different layouts. Marsden is more developed and accessible, with a walkability score of 5.4 (somewhat walkable) and far more people renting their homes (53.2%). In contrast, Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve is mostly car-dependent with a score of 2.0 and a higher share of separate houses at 89.7%. This gap in accessibility is clear in the transport data: 95.8% of Marsden homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, compared to just 4.6% in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve.
These two areas are almost identical when it comes to the share of people who have served in the Defence Force. They also share similar rates of people needing help with daily activities and those providing unpaid care. However, their growth paths are diverging. While Marsden grew by 7.1% since 2021, Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve saw a massive increase of 87.3%. Over time, the gap in rental rates has narrowed, but the difference in housing types has widened as more separate houses are built in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,767
- First area, 2016: 5,057
- First area, 2021: 8,869
- Second area, 2011: 11,489
- Second area, 2016: 14,447
- Second area, 2021: 15,988
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 28 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Marsden: 0.1% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Marsden: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Marsden: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Marsden: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Marsden: 1.3% males, 1.7% females
- 60–64 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Marsden: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 55–59 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Marsden: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 2.4% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Marsden: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Marsden: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 40–44 in Marsden: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Marsden: 3.5% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 4.5% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Marsden: 3.4% males, 4.1% females
- 25–29 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 5.2% males, 5.4% females; 25–29 in Marsden: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 20–24 in Marsden: 3.9% males, 3.8% females
- 15–19 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Marsden: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 10–14 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Marsden: 4.9% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 4.1% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Marsden: 5.0% males, 4.6% females
- 0–4 in Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve: 4.6% males, 4.4% females; 0–4 in Marsden: 4.9% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $541
- First area, 2016: $685
- First area, 2021: $793
- Second area, 2011: $542
- Second area, 2016: $579
- Second area, 2021: $633
- First area, 2011: $1,326
- First area, 2016: $1,606
- First area, 2021: $1,695
- Second area, 2011: $1,201
- Second area, 2016: $1,322
- Second area, 2021: $1,413
- First area, 2011: $1,425
- First area, 2016: $1,716
- First area, 2021: $1,850
- Second area, 2011: $1,235
- Second area, 2016: $1,339
- Second area, 2021: $1,473
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.3
- Second area, 2021: 3.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $205
- First area, 2016: $385
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $320
- Second area, 2016: $345
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,865
- First area, 2016: $1,842
- First area, 2021: $1,750
- Second area, 2011: $1,700
- Second area, 2016: $1,524
- Second area, 2021: $1,470
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve with nearby areas
Compare Marsden with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chambers Flat - Logan Reserve vs Marsden [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/311031313/chambers-flat-logan-reserve/vs/311031317/marsden