Compare
Gladstone Hinterland vs Monto - Eidsvold
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 112 km apart · Gladstone Hinterland profile · Monto - Eidsvold profile
Gladstone Hinterland Monto - Eidsvold
Monto - Eidsvold and Gladstone Hinterland are both rural Queensland areas, but they differ sharply in age and income. Monto - Eidsvold is far older, with a typical resident aged 51 and 27.8% of people aged 65 or over. In contrast, the typical person in Gladstone Hinterland is 38. This age gap is reflected in household wealth; the typical weekly household income in Gladstone Hinterland is $1,986, which is $1,005 higher than the $981 seen in Monto - Eidsvold. Additionally, Gladstone Hinterland has a much higher share of people with no religion (44.5% compared to 33.2%).
Since 2011, the gaps between these two areas have generally widened. The difference in typical income and the age gap have both grown, while more people in Monto - Eidsvold now work from home compared to Gladstone Hinterland. Despite these diverging trends, they remain alike in several ways. Both areas have about the same share of adults with bachelor degrees (around 8.8%) and similar unemployment rates, which sit between 5.5% and 6.2%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 11,747
- First area, 2021: 11,529
- Second area, 2011: 3,715
- Second area, 2016: 3,827
- Second area, 2021: 3,673
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 51 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gladstone Hinterland: 0.4% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Monto - Eidsvold: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Gladstone Hinterland: 0.7% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Gladstone Hinterland: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Gladstone Hinterland: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Monto - Eidsvold: 4.0% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Gladstone Hinterland: 2.9% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Monto - Eidsvold: 4.9% males, 4.2% females
- 60–64 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Monto - Eidsvold: 4.2% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Monto - Eidsvold: 3.9% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.9% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Monto - Eidsvold: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Monto - Eidsvold: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Gladstone Hinterland: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Monto - Eidsvold: 1.9% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Gladstone Hinterland: 2.1% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Monto - Eidsvold: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Gladstone Hinterland: 4.7% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Monto - Eidsvold: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Gladstone Hinterland: 4.4% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Gladstone Hinterland: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $719
- First area, 2021: $801
- Second area, 2011: $409
- Second area, 2016: $478
- Second area, 2021: $515
- First area, 2016: $1,762
- First area, 2021: $1,986
- Second area, 2011: $768
- Second area, 2016: $876
- Second area, 2021: $981
- First area, 2016: $1,992
- First area, 2021: $2,202
- Second area, 2011: $965
- Second area, 2016: $1,158
- Second area, 2021: $1,256
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $240
- First area, 2021: $290
- Second area, 2011: $110
- Second area, 2016: $120
- Second area, 2021: $160
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $1,885
- Second area, 2011: $1,002
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Gladstone Hinterland with nearby areas
Compare Monto - Eidsvold with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gladstone Hinterland vs Monto - Eidsvold [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/308051535/gladstone-hinterland/vs/319021508/monto-eidsvold