Compare
Agnes Water - Miriam Vale vs Monto - Eidsvold
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 108 km apart · Agnes Water - Miriam Vale profile · Monto - Eidsvold profile
Agnes Water - Miriam Vale Monto - Eidsvold
Agnes Water - Miriam Vale and Monto - Eidsvold are both rural Queensland areas, but they differ in their growth and layout. Agnes Water - Miriam Vale has seen a surge in population, growing by 20.6% since 2021, and is far more likely to have residents with no religion (43.5%). Rent is far higher there, with the typical weekly cost at $275. In contrast, Monto - Eidsvold has a larger share of bigger homes, with 72.2% having three or more bedrooms, and more recent arrivals from overseas (14.4%). It also has much better access to basics, with 34.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services, compared to just 0.7% in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale.
Both areas share very similar typical weekly household incomes of around $1,000 and the same low rate of people who speak a language other than English at home (3%). This shared economic profile exists alongside a widening gap in religious views and a growing difference in how many people have moved from overseas. While both areas are older than the national figure, the gap in their elderly populations has narrowed slightly since 2016.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 6,022
- First area, 2021: 6,807
- Second area, 2011: 3,715
- Second area, 2016: 3,827
- Second area, 2021: 3,673
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 51 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 0.6% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Monto - Eidsvold: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 1.0% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 2.4% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 4.4% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Monto - Eidsvold: 4.0% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 5.4% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Monto - Eidsvold: 4.9% males, 4.2% females
- 60–64 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 6.2% males, 5.2% females; 60–64 in Monto - Eidsvold: 4.2% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 5.2% males, 5.2% females; 55–59 in Monto - Eidsvold: 3.9% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 4.8% males, 4.3% females; 50–54 in Monto - Eidsvold: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 3.9% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Monto - Eidsvold: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 1.3% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Monto - Eidsvold: 1.9% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 20–24 in Monto - Eidsvold: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Monto - Eidsvold: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Agnes Water - Miriam Vale: 1.6% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Monto - Eidsvold: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $452
- First area, 2021: $507
- Second area, 2011: $409
- Second area, 2016: $478
- Second area, 2021: $515
- First area, 2016: $902
- First area, 2021: $1,009
- Second area, 2011: $768
- Second area, 2016: $876
- Second area, 2021: $981
- First area, 2016: $1,074
- First area, 2021: $1,277
- Second area, 2011: $965
- Second area, 2016: $1,158
- Second area, 2021: $1,256
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $240
- First area, 2021: $275
- Second area, 2011: $110
- Second area, 2016: $120
- Second area, 2021: $160
- First area, 2016: $1,500
- First area, 2021: $1,336
- Second area, 2011: $1,002
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Agnes Water - Miriam Vale with nearby areas
Compare Monto - Eidsvold with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Agnes Water - Miriam Vale vs Monto - Eidsvold [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/308051530/agnes-water-miriam-vale/vs/319021508/monto-eidsvold