Compare
Chinchilla vs Nanango
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 122 km apart · Chinchilla profile · Nanango profile
Chinchilla Nanango
Chinchilla and Nanango are two Queensland towns with very different profiles. Chinchilla is a much younger area, with a typical resident aged 35 compared to 54 in Nanango. This younger population helps explain why Chinchilla has far more families with children and a much higher share of renters (37.8% versus 19.5%). People in Chinchilla also earn significantly more, with a typical weekly household income of $1,549, which is far higher than the $883 typical in Nanango.
Both towns share similar everyday settings, with nearly identical rainfall, temperature, and a lack of public transport options. They also have a similar number of schools and a nearly equal share of people who speak little or no English. While they share these basics, the gap in their age structures has widened since 2011, and Nanango has seen a far higher increase in people owning their homes outright, which now sit at 49.8%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,086
- First area, 2016: 8,129
- First area, 2021: 8,775
- Second area, 2011: 9,411
- Second area, 2016: 9,678
- Second area, 2021: 10,003
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chinchilla: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Nanango: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Chinchilla: 1.0% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Chinchilla: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 70–74 in Chinchilla: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Nanango: 5.4% males, 4.3% females
- 65–69 in Chinchilla: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Nanango: 5.2% males, 5.3% females
- 60–64 in Chinchilla: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Nanango: 4.3% males, 4.8% females
- 55–59 in Chinchilla: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 50–54 in Chinchilla: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Chinchilla: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Chinchilla: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Chinchilla: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Nanango: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Chinchilla: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 25–29 in Chinchilla: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 25–29 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Chinchilla: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Nanango: 1.7% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Chinchilla: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Nanango: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Chinchilla: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Chinchilla: 4.3% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 0–4 in Chinchilla: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Nanango: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $618
- First area, 2016: $643
- First area, 2021: $794
- Second area, 2011: $354
- Second area, 2016: $430
- Second area, 2021: $464
- First area, 2011: $1,294
- First area, 2016: $1,332
- First area, 2021: $1,549
- Second area, 2011: $679
- Second area, 2016: $785
- Second area, 2021: $883
- First area, 2011: $1,496
- First area, 2016: $1,667
- First area, 2021: $1,930
- Second area, 2011: $789
- Second area, 2016: $957
- Second area, 2021: $1,114
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $255
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $190
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $230
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,650
- First area, 2021: $1,314
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chinchilla with nearby areas
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chinchilla vs Nanango [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/307011172/chinchilla/vs/319021509/nanango