Compare
Nundah vs Clayfield
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.0 km apart · Nundah profile · Clayfield profile
Nundah Clayfield
Nundah and Clayfield are neighbouring areas with a few sharp contrasts. Clayfield is more affluent and has more family-sized housing, with 37.2% of homes being separate houses and 45.7% having three or more bedrooms. It also has far more school enrolments (3,119 compared to 1,425) and a higher share of people earning $2,000 or more a week (22.4% versus 15.4%). Nundah is more likely to be rented (54.9% compared to 43.1%) and has a higher share of people in de facto relationships (18.7% versus 12.9%).
These two areas share a very similar typical weekly personal income, which sits around $1,060 to $1,100. They also have almost identical rates of unemployment and a similar share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents. Over time, some gaps have grown: the difference in home ownership and the number of separate houses have both widened since 2011. This reflects a growing divide between the more detached housing in Clayfield and the higher density of flats and apartments in Nundah.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 10,386
- First area, 2016: 12,230
- First area, 2021: 13,305
- Second area, 2011: 10,007
- Second area, 2016: 10,473
- Second area, 2021: 10,754
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Nundah: 0.4% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Clayfield: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Nundah: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Clayfield: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Nundah: 0.8% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Clayfield: 1.2% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Nundah: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Clayfield: 1.6% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Nundah: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Clayfield: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Nundah: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Clayfield: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Nundah: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Clayfield: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Nundah: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Clayfield: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Nundah: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Clayfield: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Nundah: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Clayfield: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Nundah: 4.8% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Clayfield: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Nundah: 6.0% males, 5.8% females; 30–34 in Clayfield: 4.5% males, 4.7% females
- 25–29 in Nundah: 6.2% males, 6.6% females; 25–29 in Clayfield: 4.4% males, 4.3% females
- 20–24 in Nundah: 4.0% males, 4.6% females; 20–24 in Clayfield: 3.5% males, 4.2% females
- 15–19 in Nundah: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 15–19 in Clayfield: 2.4% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Nundah: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 10–14 in Clayfield: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Nundah: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 5–9 in Clayfield: 2.6% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Nundah: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Clayfield: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $763
- First area, 2016: $894
- First area, 2021: $1,058
- Second area, 2011: $839
- Second area, 2016: $930
- Second area, 2021: $1,099
- First area, 2011: $1,317
- First area, 2016: $1,569
- First area, 2021: $1,763
- Second area, 2011: $1,535
- Second area, 2016: $1,689
- Second area, 2021: $1,931
- First area, 2011: $1,764
- First area, 2016: $2,011
- First area, 2021: $2,429
- Second area, 2011: $2,250
- Second area, 2016: $2,351
- Second area, 2021: $2,832
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.0
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $370
- Second area, 2011: $320
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,014
- First area, 2016: $1,820
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,100
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Nundah with nearby areas
Compare Clayfield with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Nundah vs Clayfield [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/302031040/nundah/vs/305031122/clayfield