Compare
Bridgeman Downs vs Albany Creek
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.7 km apart · Bridgeman Downs profile · Albany Creek profile
Bridgeman Downs Albany Creek
Albany Creek and Bridgeman Downs are neighbouring areas with very different layouts and demographics. Albany Creek is very walkable, with 75.6% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 61.3% near health services. In contrast, Bridgeman Downs is mostly car-dependent, where only 20.8% of homes are within a similar walk to shops. Bridgeman Downs also has a more globally diverse population, with 32.9% born overseas and 25.4% using a language other than English at home, compared to 20.6% and 7.9% in Albany Creek. High qualifications and income are more common in Bridgeman Downs, where the typical weekly household income is $2,846, well higher than the $2,267 seen in Albany Creek.
Since 2011, the gaps in income, education, and cultural diversity between the two have widened. Despite these diverging trends, the areas share a similar age profile, with a typical resident in both being 40 years old. They also have nearly identical proportions of children under 15 and similar rates of volunteering. Both areas sit comfortably above the national figure for typical household incomes and the share of adults with university degrees.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,638
- First area, 2016: 8,142
- First area, 2021: 10,501
- Second area, 2011: 15,860
- Second area, 2016: 15,800
- Second area, 2021: 16,410
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bridgeman Downs: 0.8% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Albany Creek: 0.5% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Bridgeman Downs: 0.9% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Albany Creek: 0.9% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Bridgeman Downs: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Albany Creek: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Albany Creek: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 65–69 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Albany Creek: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Albany Creek: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Albany Creek: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Albany Creek: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Albany Creek: 3.4% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Albany Creek: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Albany Creek: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Albany Creek: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.3% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Albany Creek: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Albany Creek: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 15–19 in Albany Creek: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Albany Creek: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Albany Creek: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Albany Creek: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $774
- First area, 2016: $849
- First area, 2021: $1,081
- Second area, 2011: $712
- Second area, 2016: $785
- Second area, 2021: $954
- First area, 2011: $2,182
- First area, 2016: $2,387
- First area, 2021: $2,846
- Second area, 2011: $1,807
- Second area, 2016: $1,964
- Second area, 2021: $2,267
- First area, 2011: $2,371
- First area, 2016: $2,582
- First area, 2021: $3,050
- Second area, 2011: $2,012
- Second area, 2016: $2,195
- Second area, 2021: $2,555
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $370
- First area, 2016: $420
- First area, 2021: $525
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $440
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,237
- First area, 2021: $2,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $2,037
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Bridgeman Downs with nearby areas
Compare Albany Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bridgeman Downs vs Albany Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/302011023/bridgeman-downs/vs/314011382/albany-creek