Compare
Bridgeman Downs vs Zillmere
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.6 km apart · Bridgeman Downs profile · Zillmere profile
Bridgeman Downs Zillmere
Bridgeman Downs and Zillmere are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Bridgeman Downs is a high-income area where the typical household earns $2,846 a week and 38.7% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher. In contrast, the typical household income in Zillmere is much lower at $1,426, and 23.0% of adults have a university degree. This gap in wealth is reflected in the housing; 96.6% of homes in Bridgeman Downs have three or more bedrooms, compared to 58.3% in Zillmere. While 53.0% of Zillmere residents rent their homes, only 15.0% do so in Bridgeman Downs.
Both areas share very similar employment rates, with about 60% of people working full-time. They also have nearly identical numbers of schools within 3km and very similar weather patterns. However, their daily environments differ. Zillmere is very walkable with a score of 7.6, while Bridgeman Downs is mostly car-dependent with a score of 4.0. Over time, the gap in household income and university qualifications has widened, while the difference in Year 12 completion has narrowed slightly since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,638
- First area, 2016: 8,142
- First area, 2021: 10,501
- Second area, 2011: 8,105
- Second area, 2016: 8,967
- Second area, 2021: 9,323
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bridgeman Downs: 0.8% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Zillmere: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Bridgeman Downs: 0.9% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Zillmere: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Bridgeman Downs: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Zillmere: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Zillmere: 1.5% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Zillmere: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Zillmere: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Zillmere: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Zillmere: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Zillmere: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Zillmere: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Zillmere: 4.5% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Zillmere: 5.4% males, 5.4% females
- 25–29 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.3% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Zillmere: 4.9% males, 5.6% females
- 20–24 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Zillmere: 4.0% males, 4.3% females
- 15–19 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 15–19 in Zillmere: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Zillmere: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 5–9 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Zillmere: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Zillmere: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $774
- First area, 2016: $849
- First area, 2021: $1,081
- Second area, 2011: $566
- Second area, 2016: $651
- Second area, 2021: $788
- First area, 2011: $2,182
- First area, 2016: $2,387
- First area, 2021: $2,846
- Second area, 2011: $1,052
- Second area, 2016: $1,221
- Second area, 2021: $1,426
- First area, 2011: $2,371
- First area, 2016: $2,582
- First area, 2021: $3,050
- Second area, 2011: $1,293
- Second area, 2016: $1,404
- Second area, 2021: $1,756
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $370
- First area, 2016: $420
- First area, 2021: $525
- Second area, 2011: $290
- Second area, 2016: $340
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,237
- First area, 2021: $2,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,800
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,677
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Bridgeman Downs with nearby areas
Compare Zillmere with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bridgeman Downs vs Zillmere [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/302011023/bridgeman-downs/vs/302041046/zillmere