Compare
Marsden Park - Shanes Park vs Windsor - Bligh Park
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 7.2 km apart · Marsden Park - Shanes Park profile · Windsor - Bligh Park profile
Marsden Park - Shanes Park Windsor - Bligh Park
Marsden Park - Shanes Park and Windsor - Bligh Park are neighbouring areas with similar total populations, but they have very different profiles. Marsden Park - Shanes Park is far more diverse, with 52.8% of people born overseas and 58.6% using a language other than English at home. It also has a more highly qualified workforce, with 45.6% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 13.8% in Windsor - Bligh Park. Other key differences include far higher household incomes in Marsden Park - Shanes Park, where 40.5% earn $3,000 or more a week, while Windsor - Bligh Park has a higher share of people living alone (24.8%) and more one-parent families (19.6%).
Since 2011, the two areas have tracked in opposite directions, with Marsden Park - Shanes Park seeing a huge 94.6% population growth while Windsor - Bligh Park grew by just 0.5%. Despite this, they share some basic traits, such as having almost identical unemployment rates and the same typical number of people per bedroom. Both areas also provide similar access to transport, with about 93% of homes located within a 10-minute walk of public transport.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2021: 15,524
- Second area, 2011: 15,461
- Second area, 2016: 15,328
- Second area, 2021: 15,264
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Windsor - Bligh Park: 0.4% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 75–79 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.9% males, 1.2% females; 65–69 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.0% males, 1.3% females; 60–64 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.0% males, 1.4% females; 55–59 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.6% males, 1.4% females; 50–54 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.7% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.3% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 7.8% males, 7.6% females; 35–39 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.0% males, 6.8% females; 30–34 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 25–29 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 4.1% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 15–19 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 15–19 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.7% males, 5.3% females; 5–9 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.9% males, 5.6% females; 0–4 in Windsor - Bligh Park: 3.8% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2021: $1,142
- Second area, 2011: $606
- Second area, 2016: $715
- Second area, 2021: $842
- First area, 2021: $2,729
- Second area, 2011: $1,279
- Second area, 2016: $1,544
- Second area, 2021: $1,805
- First area, 2021: $2,743
- Second area, 2011: $1,461
- Second area, 2016: $1,799
- Second area, 2021: $2,139
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $570
- Second area, 2011: $277
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2021: $2,882
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,907
- Second area, 2021: $2,100
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Marsden Park - Shanes Park with nearby areas
Compare Windsor - Bligh Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Marsden Park - Shanes Park vs Windsor - Bligh Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/116021629/marsden-park-shanes-park/vs/124041467/windsor-bligh-park