Compare
Marsden Park - Shanes Park vs Hassall Grove - Plumpton
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.4 km apart · Marsden Park - Shanes Park profile · Hassall Grove - Plumpton profile
Marsden Park - Shanes Park Hassall Grove - Plumpton
Hassall Grove - Plumpton and Marsden Park - Shanes Park are neighbouring areas in Greater Sydney with very different profiles. Marsden Park - Shanes Park is a rapidly growing area where 88.8% of people moved in during the last five years, with far higher shares of adults holding bachelor degrees (45.6%) and earning $3,000 or more a week (40.5%). In contrast, Hassall Grove - Plumpton is much more established and walkable; it is very walkable with a score of 6.4, while Marsden Park - Shanes Park is only somewhat walkable with a score of 4.0. Residents in Hassall Grove - Plumpton also have much better access to essentials, with 94.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries compared to just 32.2% in Marsden Park - Shanes Park.
Both areas sit close to the national figure for adults working or looking for work, with Hassall Grove - Plumpton at 61.8% and Marsden Park - Shanes Park at 72.4%. They share a similar home environment, with both having an average of 3.4 people per household. While Marsden Park - Shanes Park has seen a massive population surge of 94.6% since 2021, Hassall Grove - Plumpton has remained steady with growth of just 0.4%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2021: 15,524
- Second area, 2011: 19,593
- Second area, 2016: 20,671
- Second area, 2021: 21,414
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 0.2% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 75–79 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 0.7% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.9% males, 1.2% females; 65–69 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 1.9% males, 2.0% females
- 60–64 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.0% males, 1.3% females; 60–64 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.0% males, 1.4% females; 55–59 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.6% males, 1.4% females; 50–54 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.7% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.3% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 7.8% males, 7.6% females; 35–39 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.0% males, 6.8% females; 30–34 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 4.2% males, 3.7% females
- 15–19 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 15–19 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 10–14 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 5–9 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.7% males, 5.3% females; 5–9 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.9% males, 5.6% females; 0–4 in Hassall Grove - Plumpton: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2021: $1,142
- Second area, 2011: $619
- Second area, 2016: $691
- Second area, 2021: $809
- First area, 2021: $2,729
- Second area, 2011: $1,583
- Second area, 2016: $1,846
- Second area, 2021: $2,112
- First area, 2021: $2,743
- Second area, 2011: $1,584
- Second area, 2016: $1,839
- Second area, 2021: $2,162
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 3.5
- Second area, 2016: 3.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $570
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2021: $2,882
- Second area, 2011: $2,048
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,120
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Marsden Park - Shanes Park with nearby areas
Compare Hassall Grove - Plumpton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Marsden Park - Shanes Park vs Hassall Grove - Plumpton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/116021629/marsden-park-shanes-park/vs/116031315/hassall-grove-plumpton