Compare
Marsden Park - Shanes Park vs Richmond - Clarendon
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 13 km apart · Marsden Park - Shanes Park profile · Richmond - Clarendon profile
Marsden Park - Shanes Park Richmond - Clarendon
Richmond - Clarendon and Marsden Park - Shanes Park are nearby areas with similar population sizes, but they have very different social profiles. Marsden Park - Shanes Park is much younger, with 29.9% of people under 15, compared to just 16.9% in Richmond - Clarendon. This contrasts with Richmond - Clarendon, where 22.1% of residents are aged 65 and over, while only 5.5% are that age in Marsden Park - Shanes Park. Marsden Park - Shanes Park also has a much more diverse population, with 52.8% born overseas and 58.6% using a language other than English at home, compared to 15.8% and 9.1% in Richmond - Clarendon.
Both areas share a very similar level of unemployment, which sits around 4%. Despite this, the two places differ in other ways: typical weekly household income is far higher in Marsden Park - Shanes Park at $2,729, compared to $1,587 in Richmond - Clarendon. This is consistent with a higher share of university degrees in Marsden Park - Shanes Park. Meanwhile, Richmond - Clarendon has a much higher share of people living alone (30.5%) and more homes owned outright (30.8%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2021: 15,524
- Second area, 2011: 13,440
- Second area, 2016: 13,842
- Second area, 2021: 15,239
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Richmond - Clarendon: 1.2% males, 2.7% females
- 80–84 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Richmond - Clarendon: 1.4% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 75–79 in Richmond - Clarendon: 1.9% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 0.9% males, 1.2% females; 65–69 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.0% males, 1.3% females; 60–64 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.0% males, 1.4% females; 55–59 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 1.6% males, 1.4% females; 50–54 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.7% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.3% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 7.8% males, 7.6% females; 35–39 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.0% males, 6.8% females; 30–34 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 15–19 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.7% males, 5.3% females; 5–9 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Marsden Park - Shanes Park: 5.9% males, 5.6% females; 0–4 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2021: $1,142
- Second area, 2011: $591
- Second area, 2016: $658
- Second area, 2021: $790
- First area, 2021: $2,729
- Second area, 2011: $1,152
- Second area, 2016: $1,317
- Second area, 2021: $1,587
- First area, 2021: $2,743
- Second area, 2011: $1,406
- Second area, 2016: $1,638
- Second area, 2021: $2,023
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $570
- Second area, 2011: $290
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2021: $2,882
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Marsden Park - Shanes Park with nearby areas
Compare Richmond - Clarendon with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Marsden Park - Shanes Park vs Richmond - Clarendon [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/116021629/marsden-park-shanes-park/vs/124041466/richmond-clarendon