Compare
Cranbrook vs Manjimup
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 94 km apart · Cranbrook profile · Manjimup profile
Cranbrook Manjimup
Manjimup and Cranbrook are two rural Western Australian areas with very different levels of accessibility. Manjimup is more walkable, with 42.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and a walkability score of 3.4 (mostly car-dependent). In contrast, Cranbrook is car-dependent, with 0% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services or groceries. Manjimup also has much larger schools, with an average size of 187 students compared to just 54 in Cranbrook, and it receives far more rain, averaging 1,022mm annually against 503mm in Cranbrook.
These two areas share many daily realities, including almost identical proportions of people living alone and the same number of people per home. This common ground extends to their typical weekly household incomes, which sit at $1,211 in Manjimup and $1,287 in Cranbrook. While they remain similar in these respects, some gaps are widening; for example, the share of children under 15 is now 3.3 percentage points higher in Cranbrook, a gap that has grown since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,079
- First area, 2016: 1,089
- First area, 2021: 1,100
- Second area, 2011: 9,183
- Second area, 2016: 9,250
- Second area, 2021: 9,093
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cranbrook: 0.5% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Manjimup: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Cranbrook: 1.9% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Manjimup: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Cranbrook: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Manjimup: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Cranbrook: 4.0% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Manjimup: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Cranbrook: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in Manjimup: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Cranbrook: 5.7% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Manjimup: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Cranbrook: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Manjimup: 4.0% males, 4.5% females
- 50–54 in Cranbrook: 3.6% males, 4.3% females; 50–54 in Manjimup: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Cranbrook: 4.0% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Manjimup: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Cranbrook: 2.8% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Manjimup: 2.4% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Cranbrook: 2.1% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Manjimup: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Cranbrook: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 30–34 in Manjimup: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Cranbrook: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 25–29 in Manjimup: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Cranbrook: 1.8% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Manjimup: 2.3% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Cranbrook: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 15–19 in Manjimup: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Cranbrook: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Manjimup: 3.4% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Cranbrook: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Manjimup: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Cranbrook: 3.4% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Manjimup: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $485
- First area, 2016: $612
- First area, 2021: $762
- Second area, 2011: $493
- Second area, 2016: $594
- Second area, 2021: $675
- First area, 2011: $842
- First area, 2016: $1,047
- First area, 2021: $1,287
- Second area, 2011: $912
- Second area, 2016: $1,118
- Second area, 2021: $1,211
- First area, 2011: $1,031
- First area, 2016: $1,281
- First area, 2021: $1,762
- Second area, 2011: $1,122
- Second area, 2016: $1,394
- Second area, 2021: $1,616
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $80
- First area, 2016: $123
- First area, 2021: $168
- Second area, 2011: $150
- Second area, 2016: $183
- Second area, 2021: $230
- First area, 2011: $860
- First area, 2016: $878
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cranbrook with nearby areas
Compare Manjimup with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cranbrook vs Manjimup [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA52240/cranbrook/vs/LGA55180/manjimup