Compare
Kimba vs Port Lincoln
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 188 km apart · Kimba profile · Port Lincoln profile
Kimba Port Lincoln
Port Lincoln and Kimba are two South Australian areas with very different social and economic profiles. Port Lincoln is more urban, with a far higher share of renters (33.9% compared to 17.2% in Kimba) and a higher number of one-parent families (18.4% versus 5.0%). In contrast, Kimba has far more people working from home (19.7% compared to 4.1%) and a much higher rate of home ownership, with 51% of homes owned outright. The two areas also differ in their local infrastructure; Port Lincoln has much larger schools and far more homes within a short walk of public transport and parks.
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, as typical weekly household incomes are nearly the same, sitting around $1,250. Both areas also have a similar proportion of residents aged 65 and over and very few people who speak little or no English. Over time, some gaps have shifted; more people in Kimba now own their homes outright than in Port Lincoln, though this difference has narrowed since 2011. Meanwhile, the gap in the number of people working full-time has widened, with Kimba remaining far higher at 64.7%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,088
- First area, 2016: 1,061
- First area, 2021: 1,037
- Second area, 2011: 14,086
- Second area, 2016: 14,064
- Second area, 2021: 14,404
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kimba: 1.2% males, 2.6% females; 85+ in Port Lincoln: 1.2% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Kimba: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Port Lincoln: 1.2% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Kimba: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Port Lincoln: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Kimba: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Port Lincoln: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Kimba: 3.1% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Kimba: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Kimba: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Kimba: 2.4% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Kimba: 2.2% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Kimba: 3.2% males, 1.8% females; 40–44 in Port Lincoln: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Kimba: 4.2% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Kimba: 2.0% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Kimba: 2.1% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Kimba: 2.6% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Port Lincoln: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Kimba: 1.9% males, 1.6% females; 15–19 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Kimba: 4.4% males, 3.7% females; 10–14 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Kimba: 4.5% males, 4.5% females; 5–9 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Kimba: 3.1% males, 1.4% females; 0–4 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $577
- First area, 2016: $684
- First area, 2021: $744
- Second area, 2011: $523
- Second area, 2016: $603
- Second area, 2021: $717
- First area, 2011: $1,017
- First area, 2016: $1,233
- First area, 2021: $1,282
- Second area, 2011: $924
- Second area, 2016: $1,081
- Second area, 2021: $1,243
- First area, 2011: $1,365
- First area, 2016: $1,453
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,203
- Second area, 2016: $1,398
- Second area, 2021: $1,667
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $85
- First area, 2016: $85
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2011: $180
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $575
- First area, 2016: $823
- First area, 2021: $860
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kimba with nearby areas
Compare Port Lincoln with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kimba vs Port Lincoln [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA43220/kimba/vs/LGA46300/port-lincoln