Compare
Kimba vs Port Augusta
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 144 km apart · Kimba profile · Port Augusta profile
Kimba Port Augusta
Port Augusta and Kimba are two distinct South Australian regional areas with very different social profiles. Port Augusta has a far higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 20.4%, compared to just 1.3% in Kimba. The two areas also differ in housing and family structures: Port Augusta has far more one-parent families (22.4% versus 5.0%) and a much higher share of renters at 37.2%, while Kimba is dominated by homeowners, with 51.0% owning their homes outright. Port Augusta's layout is more urban, with far more people living within a 10-minute walk of public transport (86.4% versus 7.4%).
These differences stand in contrast to the many ways the two areas are alike, as they share very similar typical weekly household incomes of around $1,280 and nearly identical rates of long-term health conditions. While they share these commonalities, some gaps are shifting; for example, the difference in the typical age of residents has narrowed since 2011. Kimba remains notably older, with a typical age of 42 compared to 38 in Port Augusta.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,088
- First area, 2016: 1,061
- First area, 2021: 1,037
- Second area, 2011: 13,985
- Second area, 2016: 13,808
- Second area, 2021: 13,829
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kimba: 1.2% males, 2.6% females; 85+ in Port Augusta: 0.7% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Kimba: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Port Augusta: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Kimba: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Port Augusta: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Kimba: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Port Augusta: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Kimba: 3.1% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Port Augusta: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Kimba: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Port Augusta: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Kimba: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in Port Augusta: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Kimba: 2.4% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Port Augusta: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Kimba: 2.2% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Kimba: 3.2% males, 1.8% females; 40–44 in Port Augusta: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Kimba: 4.2% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Port Augusta: 3.6% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Kimba: 2.0% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Port Augusta: 4.3% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Kimba: 2.1% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in Port Augusta: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Kimba: 2.6% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Kimba: 1.9% males, 1.6% females; 15–19 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Kimba: 4.4% males, 3.7% females; 10–14 in Port Augusta: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Kimba: 4.5% males, 4.5% females; 5–9 in Port Augusta: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Kimba: 3.1% males, 1.4% females; 0–4 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $577
- First area, 2016: $684
- First area, 2021: $744
- Second area, 2011: $541
- Second area, 2016: $604
- Second area, 2021: $699
- First area, 2011: $1,017
- First area, 2016: $1,233
- First area, 2021: $1,282
- Second area, 2011: $986
- Second area, 2016: $1,103
- Second area, 2021: $1,275
- First area, 2011: $1,365
- First area, 2016: $1,453
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,245
- Second area, 2016: $1,370
- Second area, 2021: $1,653
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $85
- First area, 2016: $85
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2011: $150
- Second area, 2016: $180
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $575
- First area, 2016: $823
- First area, 2021: $860
- Second area, 2011: $1,200
- Second area, 2016: $1,213
- Second area, 2021: $1,153
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kimba with nearby areas
Compare Port Augusta with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kimba vs Port Augusta [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA43220/kimba/vs/LGA46090/port-augusta