Compare
Stonnington vs Whitehorse
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Stonnington profile · Whitehorse profile
Stonnington Whitehorse
Whitehorse and Stonnington are both high-advantage areas in Melbourne, but they differ in housing and demographics. Whitehorse is more family-oriented, with 72.5% of homes having three or more bedrooms and a far higher share of separate houses. In contrast, Stonnington is dominated by apartments and smaller households, with a far higher share of people living alone (39.2%). Stonnington also has a much wealthier population; the typical weekly personal income is $1,294, which is far higher than the $778 seen in Whitehorse.
These two areas have seen the gap in cultural diversity widen since 2011. Whitehorse has a far higher share of people born overseas (41.5%) and those using a language other than English at home (40.5%), while the gap in language use has grown from 8.9 to 18.3 percentage points. Despite this trend, they remain very similar in other ways, such as having nearly identical numbers of businesses and an almost identical share of residents who volunteer.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 93,145
- First area, 2016: 103,832
- First area, 2021: 104,703
- Second area, 2011: 151,334
- Second area, 2016: 162,078
- Second area, 2021: 169,346
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Stonnington: 1.0% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Whitehorse: 1.2% males, 2.0% females
- 80–84 in Stonnington: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Whitehorse: 1.2% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Stonnington: 1.5% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Whitehorse: 1.5% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Stonnington: 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Whitehorse: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Stonnington: 1.9% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Whitehorse: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Stonnington: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Whitehorse: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Stonnington: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Whitehorse: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Stonnington: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Whitehorse: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Stonnington: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Whitehorse: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Stonnington: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Whitehorse: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Stonnington: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Whitehorse: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Stonnington: 5.3% males, 5.4% females; 30–34 in Whitehorse: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Stonnington: 5.7% males, 6.3% females; 25–29 in Whitehorse: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Stonnington: 3.5% males, 4.3% females; 20–24 in Whitehorse: 4.0% males, 3.6% females
- 15–19 in Stonnington: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Whitehorse: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Stonnington: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 10–14 in Whitehorse: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Stonnington: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 5–9 in Whitehorse: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Stonnington: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Whitehorse: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $902
- First area, 2016: $1,042
- First area, 2021: $1,294
- Second area, 2011: $561
- Second area, 2016: $619
- Second area, 2021: $778
- First area, 2011: $1,722
- First area, 2016: $1,944
- First area, 2021: $2,210
- Second area, 2011: $1,317
- Second area, 2016: $1,507
- Second area, 2021: $1,841
- First area, 2011: $2,465
- First area, 2016: $2,680
- First area, 2021: $3,299
- Second area, 2011: $1,682
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $2,300
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $360
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $421
- Second area, 2011: $320
- Second area, 2016: $376
- Second area, 2021: $411
- First area, 2011: $2,447
- First area, 2016: $2,200
- First area, 2021: $2,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,231
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Stonnington with nearby areas
Compare Whitehorse with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Stonnington vs Whitehorse [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA26350/stonnington/vs/LGA26980/whitehorse