Compare
Christmas Island vs Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 976 km apart · Christmas Island profile · Cocos (Keeling) Islands profile
Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands are remote territories with very different landscapes. Christmas Island has a much steeper terrain, with a mean slope of 15.6% compared to just 2.8% for Cocos (Keeling) Islands. Access to local services varies significantly; 30.9% of homes on Christmas Island are within a 15-minute walk of health services, while Cocos (Keeling) Islands has 0.0%. However, Cocos (Keeling) Islands is far more walkable for other needs, with 66.0% of homes near a park and 29.2% near a school, compared to 40.5% and 10.7% on Christmas Island.
Both territories are mostly car-dependent and have no homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. The gap in how many homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed is narrowing, with Cocos (Keeling) Islands now only a little higher at 29.2% compared to 26.6% on Christmas Island. While both have similar numbers of amenity types within a short walk, Cocos (Keeling) Islands has far more street intersections per square kilometre.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Christmas Island with nearby areas
Compare Cocos (Keeling) Islands with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Christmas Island vs Cocos (Keeling) Islands [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE901001/christmas-island/vs/IARE901002/cocos-islands