Compare
Port Hedland vs Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 2,495 km apart · Port Hedland profile · Cocos (Keeling) Islands profile
Port Hedland Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Cocos (Keeling) Islands and Port Hedland are far-apart locations with very different layouts. Cocos (Keeling) Islands is much more convenient for food, with 94.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries compared to just 26.2% in Port Hedland. However, Port Hedland is far more connected to other services; 92.0% of its homes are near public transport while Cocos (Keeling) Islands has 0.0%. Port Hedland also has a far larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population, with 2,916 people.
Both areas share a similar flat landscape, with mean terrain slopes of 2.8% and 3.0%. The gap in overall walkability is a little higher in Port Hedland, which is described as somewhat walkable compared to Cocos (Keeling) Islands, which is mostly car-dependent. This gap in walkability has remained steady over time.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Port Hedland with nearby areas
Compare Cocos (Keeling) Islands with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Hedland vs Cocos (Keeling) Islands [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE506004/port-hedland/vs/IARE901002/cocos-islands