Compare
Roebourne - Wickham vs Christmas Island
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 1,682 km apart · Roebourne - Wickham profile · Christmas Island profile
Roebourne - Wickham Christmas Island
Christmas Island and Roebourne - Wickham are distant locations with very different profiles. In Christmas Island, First Nations households earn a typical income of $4,750, which is far higher than the $1,352 seen in Roebourne - Wickham. The First Nations population is also far older in Christmas Island, where the typical age is 60 compared to 30 in Roebourne - Wickham. While Christmas Island has much better access to groceries and health services within a 15-minute walk, Roebourne - Wickham is far more likely to have homes within walking distance of a school or a park.
Both areas are mostly car-dependent and have a similar number of different amenity types within a 15-minute walk. However, the gap in their walkability scores has grown since 2011, with Christmas Island now slightly higher than Roebourne - Wickham. While Roebourne - Wickham has a far larger number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Christmas Island shows higher typical personal incomes for this group.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Roebourne - Wickham with nearby areas
Compare Christmas Island with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Roebourne - Wickham vs Christmas Island [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE506005/roebourne-wickham/vs/IARE901001/christmas-island