Compare
Gulf vs Elliott
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 281 km apart · Gulf profile · Elliott profile
Gulf Elliott
Gulf and Elliott are two distinct Northern Territory locations with very different scales. Gulf is a vast area where First Nations unemployment is far higher at 43.0%, while Elliott has a rate of 0.0%. Language diversity is also much more common in Gulf, where 82.1% of people speak a First Nations language compared to 37.3% in Elliott. In terms of layout, Elliott is far more walkable, with a score of 2.8 (mostly car-dependent), whereas Gulf is 0.1 (car-dependent) and has almost no homes within a short walk of schools or groceries.
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to basic access, as neither has any homes within a 15-minute walk of health services, public transport, or a full 15-minute-city walkshed. While Elliott provides more immediate access to local shops and parks, First Nations household income is well higher in Gulf at $1,309, compared to $939 in Elliott. This income gap is notable as Elliott's figure is well below the national figure.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Gulf with nearby areas
Compare Elliott with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gulf vs Elliott [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE705004/gulf/vs/IARE707004/elliott