Compare
Wagga Wagga vs Young
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 127 km apart · Wagga Wagga profile · Young profile
Wagga Wagga Young
Wagga Wagga and Young are both regional New South Wales areas, but they differ significantly in how residents get around. Wagga Wagga is more walkable, with a score of 4.7 (somewhat walkable) compared to 3.3 (mostly car-dependent) in Young. This is seen in the accessibility of services; 74.9% of Wagga Wagga homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, while only 18.0% of homes in Young have the same access. Wagga Wagga also has a far larger First Nations population, with 4,471 people compared to 656 in Young.
These gaps in accessibility and population size remain stark, though the two areas share some similarities. First Nations residents in both places have the same typical age of 21, and about 5% to 6% speak a First Nations language. First Nations outcomes are well higher in Wagga Wagga, where the typical personal income is $642 and 36.2% finished Year 12, compared to $467 and 26.7% in Young.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Wagga Wagga with nearby areas
Compare Young with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Wagga Wagga vs Young [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE105021/wagga-wagga/vs/IARE105022/young