Compare
Forbes vs Young
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 94 km apart · Forbes profile · Young profile
Forbes Young
Forbes and Young are two regional New South Wales areas with distinct profiles for their First Nations populations and transport. Forbes has a far larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community of 1,233 people compared to 656 in Young. In Forbes, First Nations personal income is well higher at $640 and the unemployment rate is much lower at 8.2%. Conversely, Young has a well higher share of people who speak a First Nations language, at 6.1% compared to 1.1% in Forbes.
Everyday life is similar in both places when it comes to healthcare, as about 40% of homes in each area are within a 15-minute walk of health services. Both are also mostly car-dependent, though Forbes is slightly more walkable. While Forbes has far more homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport at 65.6%, Young has a slightly higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (39.6%) and a 15-minute-city walkshed (39.1%).
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Forbes with nearby areas
Compare Young with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Forbes vs Young [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE105011/forbes/vs/IARE105022/young