Compare
Blayney - Cabonne vs Forbes
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 98 km apart · Blayney - Cabonne profile · Forbes profile
Blayney - Cabonne Forbes
Blayney - Cabonne and Forbes are both rural areas in New South Wales, but they offer different levels of access to local services. Forbes is more walkable, with 65.6% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport compared to just 33.9% in Blayney - Cabonne. People in Forbes also have better walking access to parks (66.8% versus 53.6%), health services (40.5% versus 24.7%), and schools (54.0% versus 43.4%). In Blayney - Cabonne, First Nations households earn a typical income of $1,716, which is well higher than the $1,257 typical income in Forbes.
Both areas share a similar experience for First Nations residents regarding typical personal income and unemployment rates, which are almost identical in both places. While both are mostly car-dependent, the gap in walkability has widened over time. Blayney - Cabonne has a slightly higher share of people who speak a First Nations language (3.4% versus 1.1%) and a higher Year 12 completion rate among First Nations residents (32.6% versus 28.8%).
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Blayney - Cabonne with nearby areas
Compare Forbes with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blayney - Cabonne vs Forbes [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE105004/blayney-cabonne/vs/IARE105011/forbes