Compare
Hunter vs Shortland
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 86 km apart · Hunter profile · Shortland profile
Hunter Shortland
Hunter and Shortland are both New South Wales areas with similar population sizes, but they offer very different living environments. Shortland is more urban, with a walkability score of 5.3 (somewhat walkable) and a far higher number of homes within a 15-minute walk of parks (94.3% compared to 73.4% in Hunter) and schools (71.9% compared to 51.5% in Hunter). Hunter is more rural, with a walkability score of 3.7 (mostly car-dependent) and a higher share of separate houses and larger homes with three or more bedrooms. Hunter also has a slightly larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 8.0%.
Daily life in both places shares many similarities, including very similar typical weekly household incomes of around $1,500 to $1,600 and nearly identical shares of people born overseas. However, some gaps are widening. Residents in Shortland are now noticeably older, with a typical age of 43 compared to 40 in Hunter. Shortland also has a higher share of adults with bachelor degrees (18.5% versus 13.2% in Hunter) and more people working from home, a gap that has grown since 2016.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 139,138
- First area, 2016: 156,796
- First area, 2021: 174,420
- Second area, 2011: 134,898
- Second area, 2016: 144,482
- Second area, 2021: 151,922
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Hunter: 1.0% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Shortland: 1.1% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Hunter: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Shortland: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Hunter: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Shortland: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Hunter: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Shortland: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Hunter: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Shortland: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Hunter: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Shortland: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Hunter: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Shortland: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Hunter: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Shortland: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Hunter: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Shortland: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Hunter: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Shortland: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Hunter: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Shortland: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Hunter: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Shortland: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Hunter: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in Shortland: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Hunter: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Shortland: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Hunter: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Shortland: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Hunter: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Shortland: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Hunter: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Shortland: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Hunter: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Shortland: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $530
- First area, 2016: $589
- First area, 2021: $730
- Second area, 2011: $527
- Second area, 2016: $600
- Second area, 2021: $745
- First area, 2011: $1,059
- First area, 2016: $1,294
- First area, 2021: $1,593
- Second area, 2011: $1,052
- Second area, 2016: $1,262
- Second area, 2021: $1,535
- First area, 2011: $1,336
- First area, 2016: $1,547
- First area, 2021: $1,960
- Second area, 2011: $1,367
- Second area, 2016: $1,573
- Second area, 2021: $2,001
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $180
- First area, 2016: $290
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $280
- Second area, 2016: $325
- Second area, 2021: $375
- First area, 2011: $1,673
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,748
- Second area, 2011: $1,941
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Hunter with nearby areas
Compare Shortland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hunter vs Shortland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED121/hunter/vs/CED141/shortland