Compare
Bicheno vs Scamander
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 46 km apart · Bicheno profile · Scamander profile
Bicheno Scamander
Bicheno and Scamander are nearby Tasmanian areas with a few distinct differences. Bicheno is more internationally diverse, with 19.8% of people born overseas and 25.9% arriving from abroad recently, compared to 9.1% and 0% in Scamander. Bicheno also has more local services within reach; 89.1% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 84.2% are near health services, while Scamander sees 55.2% and 54.8% for those services. Typical weekly incomes are also higher in Bicheno at $636, compared to $496 in Scamander.
Everyday life is similar in both places, with about 28% of the population aged 65 or over and the same typical home size of two people. Both areas have about 49% of homes owned outright. While Bicheno's walkability score is somewhat walkable, Scamander is mostly car-dependent. Since 2011, the gaps between them have shifted; the difference in overseas births has flipped to a lead for Bicheno, and the gap in typical weekly incomes has widened significantly.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 781
- First area, 2016: 834
- First area, 2021: 797
- Second area, 2011: 511
- Second area, 2016: 658
- Second area, 2021: 639
- First area, 2011: 51 yrs
- First area, 2016: 50 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bicheno: 1.5% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Scamander: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Bicheno: 2.0% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Scamander: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Bicheno: 2.2% males, 3.1% females; 75–79 in Scamander: 3.6% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Bicheno: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 70–74 in Scamander: 3.8% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Bicheno: 5.8% males, 4.9% females; 65–69 in Scamander: 6.6% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Bicheno: 5.0% males, 5.3% females; 60–64 in Scamander: 4.3% males, 7.9% females
- 55–59 in Bicheno: 4.9% males, 5.7% females; 55–59 in Scamander: 4.0% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Bicheno: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Scamander: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Bicheno: 3.7% males, 1.6% females; 45–49 in Scamander: 3.2% males, 1.6% females
- 40–44 in Bicheno: 1.8% males, 2.0% females; 40–44 in Scamander: 2.8% males, 4.6% females
- 35–39 in Bicheno: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Scamander: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Bicheno: 3.1% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Scamander: 3.3% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Bicheno: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Scamander: 1.1% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Bicheno: 1.6% males, 1.1% females; 20–24 in Scamander: 1.6% males, 1.1% females
- 15–19 in Bicheno: 1.6% males, 1.0% females; 15–19 in Scamander: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 10–14 in Bicheno: 1.8% males, 1.5% females; 10–14 in Scamander: 3.6% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Bicheno: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 5–9 in Scamander: 1.7% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Bicheno: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Scamander: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $371
- First area, 2016: $430
- First area, 2021: $636
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $597
- Second area, 2021: $496
- First area, 2011: $633
- First area, 2016: $756
- First area, 2021: $1,057
- Second area, 2011: $629
- Second area, 2016: $1,255
- Second area, 2021: $870
- First area, 2011: $795
- First area, 2016: $949
- First area, 2021: $1,330
- Second area, 2011: $775
- Second area, 2016: $1,493
- Second area, 2021: $1,154
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $160
- First area, 2021: $243
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $275
- First area, 2011: $800
- First area, 2016: $888
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $850
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bicheno with nearby areas
Compare Scamander with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bicheno vs Scamander [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL621002/bicheno/vs/UCL621024/scamander