Compare
Nanango vs Proston
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 68 km apart · Nanango profile · Proston profile
Nanango Proston
Nanango and Proston (L) are two Queensland areas with very different scales and layouts. Nanango is a larger town where 70.7% of homes have three or more bedrooms, while Proston (L) is a small, sparsely populated area where 55.6% of homes are owned outright. Proston (L) is much more walkable, described as somewhat walkable compared to Nanango, which is mostly car-dependent. This is seen in the fact that 95.6% of Proston (L) residents live within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to just 40.6% in Nanango.
The gap in home ownership has widened since 2011, with Proston (L) now far higher in outright ownership. Despite this, the two areas share a nearly identical age profile, with a typical resident being 52 and about 32.4% of the population aged 65 and over. They also both have similar proportions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, sitting at 6.2% in Nanango and 5.7% in Proston (L).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,092
- First area, 2016: 4,326
- First area, 2021: 3,438
- Second area, 2011: 353
- Second area, 2016: 392
- Second area, 2021: 281
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Nanango: 1.1% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Proston: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Proston: 3.1% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Nanango: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 75–79 in Proston: 2.7% males, 3.4% females
- 70–74 in Nanango: 4.8% males, 5.0% females; 70–74 in Proston: 8.2% males, 5.5% females
- 65–69 in Nanango: 4.4% males, 4.7% females; 65–69 in Proston: 3.8% males, 4.8% females
- 60–64 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Proston: 4.1% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Proston: 1.7% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Nanango: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Proston: 4.5% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Nanango: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Proston: 2.1% males, 1.0% females
- 40–44 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Proston: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 35–39 in Proston: 0.0% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 30–34 in Proston: 2.4% males, 1.7% females
- 25–29 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Proston: 2.7% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Proston: 1.0% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Nanango: 3.1% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Proston: 4.8% males, 1.7% females
- 10–14 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Proston: 3.4% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Nanango: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Proston: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Nanango: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Proston: 1.4% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $408
- First area, 2016: $571
- First area, 2021: $473
- Second area, 2011: $724
- Second area, 2016: $771
- Second area, 2021: $446
- First area, 2011: $762
- First area, 2016: $1,101
- First area, 2021: $860
- Second area, 2011: $1,583
- Second area, 2016: $1,968
- Second area, 2021: $762
- First area, 2011: $916
- First area, 2016: $1,279
- First area, 2021: $1,153
- Second area, 2011: $1,856
- Second area, 2016: $2,017
- Second area, 2021: $885
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 3.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $260
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $180
- First area, 2011: $1,014
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $997
- Second area, 2011: $2,800
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $577
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Compare Proston with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Nanango vs Proston [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315074/nanango/vs/UCL322099/proston