Compare
Nanango vs Blackbutt
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 27 km apart · Nanango profile · Blackbutt profile
Nanango Blackbutt
Nanango and Blackbutt (L) are nearby Queensland towns with very different layouts. Blackbutt (L) is very walkable, with 98.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 98.2% near health services. In contrast, Nanango is mostly car-dependent, with only 40.6% of homes within a short walk of groceries. Residents are far older in Blackbutt (L), where the typical age is 61 compared to 52 in Nanango. Home ownership also differs, as 54.6% of homes in Blackbutt (L) are owned outright, which is far higher than the 40.7% in Nanango.
Both areas sit close to the national figure for the share of people providing unpaid care. They are also very similar in their typical weekly incomes, with Nanango at $473 and Blackbutt (L) at $460. While Nanango has a well higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 6.2%, this gap has narrowed since 2011. Other differences are shifting too; the gap in the number of people working or looking for work has narrowed, and the lead in unemployment has flipped, with Blackbutt (L) now having a well higher rate.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,092
- First area, 2016: 4,326
- First area, 2021: 3,438
- Second area, 2011: 818
- Second area, 2016: 888
- Second area, 2021: 606
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 61 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Nanango: 1.1% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Blackbutt: 0.8% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Blackbutt: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Nanango: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 75–79 in Blackbutt: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
- 70–74 in Nanango: 4.8% males, 5.0% females; 70–74 in Blackbutt: 7.0% males, 5.7% females
- 65–69 in Nanango: 4.4% males, 4.7% females; 65–69 in Blackbutt: 4.6% males, 7.5% females
- 60–64 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Blackbutt: 3.1% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Blackbutt: 3.1% males, 5.1% females
- 50–54 in Nanango: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Blackbutt: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Nanango: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Blackbutt: 2.8% males, 1.8% females
- 40–44 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Blackbutt: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 35–39 in Blackbutt: 1.6% males, 1.5% females
- 30–34 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 30–34 in Blackbutt: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 25–29 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Blackbutt: 1.3% males, 1.8% females
- 20–24 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Blackbutt: 1.3% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Nanango: 3.1% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Blackbutt: 1.6% males, 0.8% females
- 10–14 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Blackbutt: 2.8% males, 1.3% females
- 5–9 in Nanango: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Blackbutt: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Nanango: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Blackbutt: 1.6% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $408
- First area, 2016: $571
- First area, 2021: $473
- Second area, 2011: $736
- Second area, 2016: $692
- Second area, 2021: $460
- First area, 2011: $762
- First area, 2016: $1,101
- First area, 2021: $860
- Second area, 2011: $1,773
- Second area, 2016: $1,599
- Second area, 2021: $746
- First area, 2011: $916
- First area, 2016: $1,279
- First area, 2021: $1,153
- Second area, 2011: $1,904
- Second area, 2016: $1,737
- Second area, 2021: $935
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $260
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $230
- First area, 2011: $1,014
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $997
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,717
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Compare Blackbutt with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Nanango vs Blackbutt [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315074/nanango/vs/UCL321016/blackbutt