Compare
Dalby vs Chinchilla
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 82 km apart · Dalby profile · Chinchilla profile
Dalby Chinchilla
Dalby and Chinchilla are two Queensland towns about 82km apart with distinct community profiles. Chinchilla has a far higher share of recent overseas arrivals (33.3% compared to 14.0% in Dalby) and a much higher proportion of renters (45.5% vs 35.9%). Local layouts also differ; Chinchilla has far higher street connectivity and more homes within a 15-minute walk of parks and health services. In contrast, Dalby is more likely to have separate houses and has a far higher share of homes within walking distance of groceries.
Both towns are very similar in their core demographics, including a nearly identical share of children under 15 and seniors, and almost the same typical weekly household income. This shared profile extends to the proportion of residents who volunteer or have served in the Defence Force. While some gaps have shifted, such as the share of people who moved recently being well higher in Chinchilla, other differences like the high number of overseas arrivals in Chinchilla have remained steady since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 10,861
- First area, 2016: 12,005
- First area, 2021: 12,082
- Second area, 2011: 6,178
- Second area, 2016: 8,120
- Second area, 2021: 6,292
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dalby: 0.7% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Chinchilla: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Dalby: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Chinchilla: 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Dalby: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Chinchilla: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Dalby: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Chinchilla: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Dalby: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Chinchilla: 2.6% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Dalby: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Chinchilla: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Dalby: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Chinchilla: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Dalby: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Chinchilla: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Dalby: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Chinchilla: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Dalby: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Chinchilla: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Dalby: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Chinchilla: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Dalby: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Chinchilla: 4.0% males, 4.1% females
- 25–29 in Dalby: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Chinchilla: 4.3% males, 4.9% females
- 20–24 in Dalby: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Chinchilla: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Dalby: 3.8% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Chinchilla: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Dalby: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Chinchilla: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Dalby: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Chinchilla: 4.1% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Dalby: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Chinchilla: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $601
- First area, 2016: $667
- First area, 2021: $752
- Second area, 2011: $440
- Second area, 2016: $509
- Second area, 2021: $792
- First area, 2011: $1,205
- First area, 2016: $1,310
- First area, 2021: $1,451
- Second area, 2011: $877
- Second area, 2016: $1,040
- Second area, 2021: $1,496
- First area, 2011: $1,400
- First area, 2016: $1,586
- First area, 2021: $1,811
- Second area, 2011: $1,041
- Second area, 2016: $1,298
- Second area, 2021: $1,842
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $255
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,461
- First area, 2016: $1,454
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,326
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,209
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Dalby with nearby areas
Compare Chinchilla with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dalby vs Chinchilla [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL313003/dalby/vs/UCL314008/chinchilla