Compare
Dalby vs Cecil Plains
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 37 km apart · Dalby profile · Cecil Plains profile
Dalby Cecil Plains
Dalby and Cecil Plains (L) are nearby Queensland areas with very different scales and demographics. Dalby is much larger and younger, with a typical resident aged 35, while the typical person in Cecil Plains (L) is 44. Dalby has a more qualified workforce, with 44.4% of residents completing Year 12 compared to 22.0% in Cecil Plains (L). While Dalby has better access to essential services like groceries (58.8% within a 15-minute walk versus 0.0% in Cecil Plains (L)), Cecil Plains (L) is more walkable for leisure, with 98.2% of homes near a park.
Since 2011, the gaps between these two areas have shifted significantly. The age difference has widened, and Dalby has seen its lead grow in typical household income and university qualifications. Both areas share similar family structures, with about 22% of their populations being children under 15. They also have similar proportions of people providing unpaid care and a similar lack of public transport options, as almost no one in either area commutes by bus or train.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 10,861
- First area, 2016: 12,005
- First area, 2021: 12,082
- Second area, 2011: 205
- Second area, 2016: 159
- Second area, 2021: 238
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dalby: 0.7% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Cecil Plains: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Dalby: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Cecil Plains: 1.7% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Dalby: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Cecil Plains: 4.4% males, 3.9% females
- 70–74 in Dalby: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Cecil Plains: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Dalby: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Cecil Plains: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 60–64 in Dalby: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Cecil Plains: 7.0% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Dalby: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Cecil Plains: 3.9% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Dalby: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Cecil Plains: 3.5% males, 6.6% females
- 45–49 in Dalby: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Cecil Plains: 4.4% males, 1.3% females
- 40–44 in Dalby: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Cecil Plains: 3.1% males, 1.3% females
- 35–39 in Dalby: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Cecil Plains: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Dalby: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Cecil Plains: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Dalby: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Cecil Plains: 2.6% males, 4.8% females
- 20–24 in Dalby: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Cecil Plains: 1.7% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Dalby: 3.8% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Cecil Plains: 3.5% males, 1.7% females
- 10–14 in Dalby: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Cecil Plains: 3.5% males, 4.8% females
- 5–9 in Dalby: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Cecil Plains: 4.4% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Dalby: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Cecil Plains: 3.1% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $601
- First area, 2016: $667
- First area, 2021: $752
- Second area, 2011: $553
- Second area, 2016: $624
- Second area, 2021: $667
- First area, 2011: $1,205
- First area, 2016: $1,310
- First area, 2021: $1,451
- Second area, 2011: $1,333
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,091
- First area, 2011: $1,400
- First area, 2016: $1,586
- First area, 2021: $1,811
- Second area, 2011: $1,278
- Second area, 2016: $1,374
- Second area, 2021: $1,375
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $255
- Second area, 2016: $130
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,461
- First area, 2016: $1,454
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,500
- Second area, 2021: $964
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Dalby with nearby areas
Compare Cecil Plains with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dalby vs Cecil Plains [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL313003/dalby/vs/UCL322026/cecil-plains