Compare
Paynesville vs Lindenow
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 27 km apart · Paynesville profile · Lindenow profile
Paynesville Lindenow
Paynesville and Lindenow (L) are nearby Victorian areas with very different populations. Paynesville is much older, with a typical resident aged 64 and 48.2% of people aged 65 and over. This is reflected in the health and housing data, where the share of people with a long-term health condition is far higher at 47.0% and 58.6% of homes are owned outright. In contrast, Lindenow (L) is younger, with a typical age of 44, and has a much higher share of recent overseas arrivals at 48.8%.
Both areas sit near the national figure for people who have moved in the last five years, with Paynesville at 40.6% and Lindenow (L) at 30.3%. While they share similar monthly mortgage payments and a lack of public transport commuting, they differ in their layout. Lindenow (L) has more detached houses and better access to groceries on foot, whereas Paynesville has more street intersections and better walking access to health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,134
- First area, 2016: 2,919
- First area, 2021: 3,505
- Second area, 2011: 840
- Second area, 2016: 793
- Second area, 2021: 554
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 64 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Paynesville: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 85+ in Lindenow: 1.3% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Paynesville: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 80–84 in Lindenow: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Paynesville: 5.1% males, 4.9% females; 75–79 in Lindenow: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Paynesville: 7.1% males, 6.7% females; 70–74 in Lindenow: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Paynesville: 5.4% males, 6.6% females; 65–69 in Lindenow: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 60–64 in Paynesville: 4.5% males, 5.0% females; 60–64 in Lindenow: 3.6% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Paynesville: 3.1% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Lindenow: 4.2% males, 4.2% females
- 50–54 in Paynesville: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Lindenow: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Paynesville: 1.9% males, 2.4% females; 45–49 in Lindenow: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 40–44 in Lindenow: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 35–39 in Paynesville: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 35–39 in Lindenow: 4.5% males, 3.8% females
- 30–34 in Paynesville: 1.0% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Lindenow: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Paynesville: 1.6% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Lindenow: 5.6% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Paynesville: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 20–24 in Lindenow: 2.7% males, 1.3% females
- 15–19 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Lindenow: 1.4% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 10–14 in Lindenow: 3.1% males, 2.0% females
- 5–9 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 5–9 in Lindenow: 3.8% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Paynesville: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Lindenow: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $386
- First area, 2016: $486
- First area, 2021: $554
- Second area, 2011: $581
- Second area, 2016: $583
- Second area, 2021: $701
- First area, 2011: $773
- First area, 2016: $861
- First area, 2021: $975
- Second area, 2011: $1,572
- Second area, 2016: $1,060
- Second area, 2021: $1,302
- First area, 2011: $921
- First area, 2016: $1,141
- First area, 2021: $1,276
- Second area, 2011: $1,506
- Second area, 2016: $1,338
- Second area, 2021: $1,491
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $180
- Second area, 2021: $255
- First area, 2011: $1,055
- First area, 2016: $997
- First area, 2021: $1,202
- Second area, 2011: $1,800
- Second area, 2016: $964
- Second area, 2021: $1,181
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Paynesville with nearby areas
Compare Lindenow with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Paynesville vs Lindenow [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215068/paynesville/vs/UCL221042/lindenow