Compare
Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff vs Cape Schanck
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 32 km apart · Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff profile · Cape Schanck profile
Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff Cape Schanck
Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff and Cape Schanck (L) are both coastal Victorian areas with older populations, but they differ sharply in layout and wealth. Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff is a somewhat walkable area where 43.4% of people are seniors and 30.9% live alone. In contrast, Cape Schanck (L) is car-dependent, with a higher share of top earners, as 32.1% of households earn $3,000 or more a week compared to 20.4% in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff. Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff also sees much more movement, with 43.9% of residents having moved in the last five years.
Both areas are very similar in their low unemployment rates, which are both 2.9%, and share nearly identical proportions of recent overseas arrivals. While they share these traits, the gaps in other areas are shifting; since 2011, Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff has become noticeably older and more likely to have volunteers than Cape Schanck (L). Meanwhile, the gap in typical weekly household income has widened, with Cape Schanck (L) now earning $651 more than Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,736
- First area, 2016: 5,520
- First area, 2021: 5,265
- Second area, 2011: 718
- Second area, 2016: 841
- Second area, 2021: 503
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 61 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 2.5% males, 3.2% females; 85+ in Cape Schanck: 0.0% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 80–84 in Cape Schanck: 1.0% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 4.1% males, 4.5% females; 75–79 in Cape Schanck: 3.2% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 5.4% males, 5.7% females; 70–74 in Cape Schanck: 6.0% males, 4.4% females
- 65–69 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 5.8% males, 6.5% females; 65–69 in Cape Schanck: 5.8% males, 4.8% females
- 60–64 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 4.0% males, 5.0% females; 60–64 in Cape Schanck: 5.0% males, 7.3% females
- 55–59 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 3.0% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Cape Schanck: 4.0% males, 4.8% females
- 50–54 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Cape Schanck: 4.6% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 2.1% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Cape Schanck: 2.2% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 1.5% males, 2.2% females; 40–44 in Cape Schanck: 0.6% males, 2.2% females
- 35–39 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 35–39 in Cape Schanck: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 30–34 in Cape Schanck: 1.8% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 25–29 in Cape Schanck: 1.6% males, 0.8% females
- 20–24 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in Cape Schanck: 0.6% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 2.0% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Cape Schanck: 2.0% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 10–14 in Cape Schanck: 1.4% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 5–9 in Cape Schanck: 2.4% males, 1.8% females
- 0–4 in Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Cape Schanck: 2.0% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $441
- First area, 2016: $519
- First area, 2021: $824
- Second area, 2011: $518
- Second area, 2016: $537
- Second area, 2021: $993
- First area, 2011: $793
- First area, 2016: $909
- First area, 2021: $1,525
- Second area, 2011: $1,036
- Second area, 2016: $880
- Second area, 2021: $2,176
- First area, 2011: $1,040
- First area, 2016: $1,273
- First area, 2021: $1,958
- Second area, 2011: $1,218
- Second area, 2016: $1,183
- Second area, 2021: $2,304
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $175
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2016: $243
- Second area, 2021: $336
- First area, 2011: $953
- First area, 2016: $953
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,192
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.60
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff with nearby areas
Compare Cape Schanck with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Point Lonsdale - Queenscliff vs Cape Schanck [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL214017/point-lonsdale-queenscliff/vs/UCL221015/cape-schanck