Compare
Bannockburn vs Meredith
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 23 km apart · Bannockburn profile · Meredith profile
Bannockburn Meredith
Bannockburn and Meredith (L) are nearby Victorian areas with very different profiles. Bannockburn is a larger, younger hub where 25.4% of residents are children and 94.1% of homes have three or more bedrooms. It is much wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $2,063 and 22.9% of homes earning $3,000 or more a week. Meredith (L) is smaller and more aged, with residents who are noticeably older. While it is more walkable for schools and public transport, it has no groceries or health services within a 15-minute walk, unlike Bannockburn.
Both areas are mostly car-dependent and share a similar proportion of people born overseas and those with a mental health condition. Over time, the gap in typical weekly incomes has widened to $538, while the difference in the typical age of residents has narrowed to six years. The two areas also track closely regarding the share of detached houses, which make up over 95% of homes in both places.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,328
- First area, 2016: 9,298
- First area, 2021: 6,178
- Second area, 2011: 291
- Second area, 2016: 215
- Second area, 2021: 412
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 55 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bannockburn: 0.5% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Meredith: 0.0% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Bannockburn: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Meredith: 0.0% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Bannockburn: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Meredith: 1.7% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Bannockburn: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Meredith: 2.9% males, 1.5% females
- 65–69 in Bannockburn: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Meredith: 5.9% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Bannockburn: 1.8% males, 1.9% females; 60–64 in Meredith: 1.7% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Bannockburn: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 55–59 in Meredith: 3.4% males, 4.9% females
- 50–54 in Bannockburn: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Meredith: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Bannockburn: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Meredith: 3.7% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Meredith: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in Meredith: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Meredith: 2.4% males, 5.1% females
- 25–29 in Bannockburn: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Meredith: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Bannockburn: 2.5% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Meredith: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Bannockburn: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Meredith: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 10–14 in Bannockburn: 4.3% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Meredith: 3.2% males, 4.4% females
- 5–9 in Bannockburn: 4.8% males, 4.7% females; 5–9 in Meredith: 4.1% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Bannockburn: 4.3% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Meredith: 2.4% males, 0.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $452
- First area, 2016: $525
- First area, 2021: $849
- Second area, 2011: $353
- Second area, 2016: $453
- Second area, 2021: $633
- First area, 2011: $770
- First area, 2016: $874
- First area, 2021: $2,063
- Second area, 2011: $577
- Second area, 2016: $700
- Second area, 2021: $1,525
- First area, 2011: $1,024
- First area, 2016: $1,175
- First area, 2021: $2,246
- Second area, 2011: $733
- Second area, 2016: $1,055
- Second area, 2021: $1,843
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 1.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,192
- First area, 2016: $1,127
- First area, 2021: $1,863
- Second area, 2011: $542
- Second area, 2016: $796
- Second area, 2021: $1,387
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bannockburn with nearby areas
Compare Meredith with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bannockburn vs Meredith [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL214002/bannockburn/vs/UCL222052/meredith