Compare
Gisborne vs Riddells Creek
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 7.8 km apart · Gisborne profile · Riddells Creek profile
Gisborne Riddells Creek
Gisborne and Riddells Creek are neighbouring areas in the Macedon Ranges with very different layouts. Gisborne has much more street connectivity and far more homes within a short walk of public transport (95.2%) and schools (76.8%). In contrast, Riddells Creek is far better for those walking to groceries (55.4%) or health services (47.3%). Gisborne is also a younger area, with more children under 15 (23.8%) and a lower typical age of 39, compared to 42 in Riddells Creek.
These two places are very similar in other ways, with almost identical shares of one-parent families and people providing unpaid care. They also share a similar housing feel, as the typical home in both areas has 2.8 or 2.9 people. While they share these traits, some gaps are shifting; for example, the difference in the number of people with bachelor degrees has narrowed since 2011, and the gap in typical weekly family income has also shrunk.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 15,262
- First area, 2016: 12,906
- First area, 2021: 10,999
- Second area, 2011: 1,133
- Second area, 2016: 2,724
- Second area, 2021: 3,574
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gisborne: 0.7% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Riddells Creek: 0.6% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Gisborne: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Riddells Creek: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Gisborne: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Riddells Creek: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Gisborne: 1.9% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Riddells Creek: 2.0% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Gisborne: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Riddells Creek: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Gisborne: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Riddells Creek: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Gisborne: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Riddells Creek: 4.3% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Gisborne: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Riddells Creek: 3.3% males, 4.7% females
- 45–49 in Gisborne: 3.6% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Riddells Creek: 3.4% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Gisborne: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 40–44 in Riddells Creek: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Gisborne: 3.3% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Riddells Creek: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Gisborne: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Riddells Creek: 2.1% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 25–29 in Riddells Creek: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Gisborne: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Riddells Creek: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Gisborne: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Riddells Creek: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Gisborne: 4.3% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Riddells Creek: 4.0% males, 4.2% females
- 5–9 in Gisborne: 4.7% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in Riddells Creek: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Gisborne: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Riddells Creek: 2.3% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $530
- First area, 2016: $602
- First area, 2021: $948
- Second area, 2011: $418
- Second area, 2016: $498
- Second area, 2021: $907
- First area, 2011: $923
- First area, 2016: $1,103
- First area, 2021: $2,288
- Second area, 2011: $784
- Second area, 2016: $907
- Second area, 2021: $2,163
- First area, 2011: $1,195
- First area, 2016: $1,402
- First area, 2021: $2,645
- Second area, 2011: $927
- Second area, 2016: $1,216
- Second area, 2021: $2,436
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $248
- First area, 2021: $432
- Second area, 2016: $176
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,185
- First area, 2016: $1,303
- First area, 2021: $2,100
- Second area, 2011: $1,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,985
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Gisborne with nearby areas
Compare Riddells Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gisborne vs Riddells Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL213006/gisborne/vs/UCL215071/riddells-creek