Riddells Creek · Urban Centre

Walkability in Riddells Creek

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Fewer than half of all homes in Riddells Creek meet the 15-minute-city test, meaning they cannot reach a variety of daily needs on foot. The area is mostly car-dependent, with a walkability score of 3.8 that is far below the Victorian figure of 6.4.

Open map →
📍 Riddells Creek, Urban Centre

Where Riddells Creek sits — Walkability score

3.8 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Riddells Creek — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Riddells Creek3.8
3431, VIC 3.2
Victoria 6.4

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Riddells Creek by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

Only 48% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, which is far below the 74.3% seen across Victoria. Residents typically have access to just 3.7 different types of amenities within a 15-minute walk, also far below the state average of 6.0.

3.8

Mostly car-dependent of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.7

Lower than 63% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

48.0%

Lower than 58% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Parks are the most accessible amenity, with 86.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk. In contrast, access to health services is the weakest, with 47.3% of homes within walking distance—far below the Victorian figure of 64.2%.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area has 21 intersections per square kilometre and a mean terrain slope of 3.7%, which is a little below the Victorian average. There are 8.7 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, a figure far below the state average of 15.7.

8.7

Lower than 80% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

3.7%

Lower than 66% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Riddells Creek

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Riddells Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL215071/riddells-creek/topic/walkability