Compare
Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) vs Rochester
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 25 km apart · Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) profile · Rochester profile
Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) Rochester
Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) and Rochester are nearby Victorian towns with different demographic profiles. Rochester has a much older population, with a typical resident aged 54 compared to 45 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part). This age gap is reflected in housing, where homes are far more likely to be owned outright in Rochester (50.2%) than in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) (36.8%). Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) has a more active workforce, with 56.2% of adults working or looking for work, compared to 45.7% in Rochester, and its residents are more likely to have a bachelor degree (14.0%) or have finished Year 12 (39.0%).
The age gap between the two areas has narrowed since 2011, falling from 16 years to 9 years. Despite this, they remain quite similar in other ways, such as being somewhat walkable and having nearly identical rates of unemployment. Both areas also have a very low share of people who speak little or no English (0.6%), which is far below the national figure. While Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) is far more walkable for schools and groceries, Rochester has a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services (61.5%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 31,361
- First area, 2016: 46,199
- First area, 2021: 13,764
- Second area, 2011: 1,083
- Second area, 2016: 1,218
- Second area, 2021: 2,802
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 1.4% males, 2.3% females; 85+ in Rochester: 2.0% males, 3.4% females
- 80–84 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 80–84 in Rochester: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 75–79 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Rochester: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 70–74 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Rochester: 4.1% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Rochester: 3.7% males, 4.5% females
- 60–64 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Rochester: 4.2% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.8% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Rochester: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Rochester: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Rochester: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Rochester: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 35–39 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Rochester: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Rochester: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 25–29 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Rochester: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Rochester: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Rochester: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Rochester: 2.9% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Rochester: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part): 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Rochester: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $466
- First area, 2016: $583
- First area, 2021: $705
- Second area, 2011: $482
- Second area, 2016: $531
- Second area, 2021: $569
- First area, 2011: $853
- First area, 2016: $1,135
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $897
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,028
- First area, 2011: $1,063
- First area, 2016: $1,385
- First area, 2021: $1,673
- Second area, 2011: $1,174
- Second area, 2016: $1,367
- Second area, 2021: $1,424
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $225
- First area, 2021: $285
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $220
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,414
- Second area, 2011: $1,192
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,083
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) with nearby areas
Compare Rochester with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Echuca - Moama (Echuca Part) vs Rochester [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL212002/echuca-moama/vs/UCL215073/rochester