Compare
Thirlmere vs Belimbla Park
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Thirlmere profile · Belimbla Park profile
Thirlmere Belimbla Park
Thirlmere and Belimbla Park (L) are nearby New South Wales areas with very different layouts and lifestyles. Thirlmere is a somewhat walkable area where 73.7% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services, while Belimbla Park (L) is car-dependent with no homes within that distance of these amenities. Thirlmere has a more transient population, with 44.8% of people moving in the last five years, and it has a far higher share of renters at 22.6% compared to just 3.5% in Belimbla Park (L).
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people aged 65 and over. They also share similar levels of overseas birth and the proportion of people who completed Year 12. However, the gaps between them are often widening; for example, the difference in typical weekly household income has grown to $512, with Belimbla Park (L) now well higher at $2,213.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,706
- First area, 2016: 1,484
- First area, 2021: 4,118
- Second area, 2011: 546
- Second area, 2016: 581
- Second area, 2021: 576
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Thirlmere: 1.2% males, 1.7% females; 85+ in Belimbla Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Thirlmere: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Belimbla Park: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Thirlmere: 1.8% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Belimbla Park: 1.2% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Thirlmere: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Belimbla Park: 1.9% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Thirlmere: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Belimbla Park: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Thirlmere: 2.4% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Belimbla Park: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Thirlmere: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Belimbla Park: 2.4% males, 4.3% females
- 50–54 in Thirlmere: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Belimbla Park: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Thirlmere: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Belimbla Park: 4.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Thirlmere: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Belimbla Park: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Thirlmere: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Belimbla Park: 3.3% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Thirlmere: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Belimbla Park: 4.3% males, 4.0% females
- 25–29 in Thirlmere: 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Belimbla Park: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Thirlmere: 2.9% males, 3.9% females; 20–24 in Belimbla Park: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Thirlmere: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Belimbla Park: 4.6% males, 4.3% females
- 10–14 in Thirlmere: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Belimbla Park: 3.8% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Thirlmere: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Belimbla Park: 4.1% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Thirlmere: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Belimbla Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $648
- First area, 2016: $576
- First area, 2021: $792
- Second area, 2011: $610
- Second area, 2016: $732
- Second area, 2021: $789
- First area, 2011: $1,455
- First area, 2016: $1,089
- First area, 2021: $1,701
- Second area, 2011: $1,676
- Second area, 2016: $1,980
- Second area, 2021: $2,213
- First area, 2011: $1,586
- First area, 2016: $1,352
- First area, 2021: $2,062
- Second area, 2011: $1,839
- Second area, 2016: $2,012
- Second area, 2021: $2,216
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $180
- First area, 2021: $412
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $480
- First area, 2011: $1,800
- First area, 2016: $1,133
- First area, 2021: $2,275
- Second area, 2011: $2,067
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,392
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Thirlmere with nearby areas
Compare Belimbla Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Thirlmere vs Belimbla Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL115137/thirlmere/vs/UCL121005/belimbla-park