Compare
The Oaks vs Belimbla Park
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 2.7 km apart · The Oaks profile · Belimbla Park profile
The Oaks Belimbla Park
The Oaks and Belimbla Park (L) are neighbouring areas with very different levels of accessibility. The Oaks is very walkable, with 91.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school and 88% near groceries; by contrast, Belimbla Park (L) is car-dependent, with no homes within walking distance of either. The Oaks is also more dynamic, as 40.4% of residents moved there in the last five years, compared to 25.2% in Belimbla Park (L).
Both areas share a similar typical weekly household income of around $2,200 and have roughly the same proportion of residents born overseas. They also both have large homes, with the vast majority being separate houses. While they share these core traits, some gaps are shifting; for example, the typical age in The Oaks is now 35 compared to 39 in Belimbla Park (L), a reversal from 2011 when The Oaks was the older of the two.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,997
- First area, 2016: 1,001
- First area, 2021: 2,171
- Second area, 2011: 546
- Second area, 2016: 581
- Second area, 2021: 576
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 56 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in The Oaks: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Belimbla Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in The Oaks: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Belimbla Park: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in The Oaks: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Belimbla Park: 1.2% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in The Oaks: 1.9% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Belimbla Park: 1.9% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in The Oaks: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Belimbla Park: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in The Oaks: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Belimbla Park: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in The Oaks: 1.9% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Belimbla Park: 2.4% males, 4.3% females
- 50–54 in The Oaks: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Belimbla Park: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in The Oaks: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Belimbla Park: 4.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in The Oaks: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Belimbla Park: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in The Oaks: 4.4% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Belimbla Park: 3.3% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in The Oaks: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Belimbla Park: 4.3% males, 4.0% females
- 25–29 in The Oaks: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Belimbla Park: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in The Oaks: 2.9% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Belimbla Park: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in The Oaks: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 15–19 in Belimbla Park: 4.6% males, 4.3% females
- 10–14 in The Oaks: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Belimbla Park: 3.8% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in The Oaks: 4.5% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Belimbla Park: 4.1% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in The Oaks: 4.5% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Belimbla Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $389
- First area, 2016: $559
- First area, 2021: $940
- Second area, 2011: $610
- Second area, 2016: $732
- Second area, 2021: $789
- First area, 2011: $667
- First area, 2016: $1,018
- First area, 2021: $2,232
- Second area, 2011: $1,676
- Second area, 2016: $1,980
- Second area, 2021: $2,213
- First area, 2011: $886
- First area, 2016: $1,272
- First area, 2021: $2,439
- Second area, 2011: $1,839
- Second area, 2016: $2,012
- Second area, 2021: $2,216
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 3.1
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $264
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $480
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $2,370
- Second area, 2011: $2,067
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,392
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare The Oaks with nearby areas
Compare Belimbla Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). The Oaks vs Belimbla Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL115136/the-oaks/vs/UCL121005/belimbla-park