Compare
Lithgow vs Portland
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 22 km apart · Lithgow profile · Portland profile
Lithgow Portland
Lithgow and Portland (NSW) are nearby New South Wales towns with distinct housing and social profiles. Lithgow has a far higher share of renters at 31.3%, while Portland (NSW) is dominated by separate houses, which make up 97.7% of its homes. Residents in Portland (NSW) generally have better access to local services on foot, with 80.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services compared to 55.9% in Lithgow. In contrast, Lithgow has a more qualified workforce, with 10.7% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 6.4% in Portland (NSW).
Both areas are very similar in their age profile, with a typical resident aged 47 in Lithgow and 48 in Portland (NSW). They also share a similar family structure, with about 16% of people in both areas being children under 15. While these towns are alike in some ways, other gaps have shifted since 2011; for example, the typical monthly mortgage payment is now well higher in Lithgow, and the share of renters has grown more significantly there than in Portland (NSW).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 16,598
- First area, 2016: 10,648
- First area, 2021: 11,197
- Second area, 2011: 1,837
- Second area, 2016: 4,541
- Second area, 2021: 1,841
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 56 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lithgow: 1.2% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Portland: 1.0% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Lithgow: 1.6% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Portland: 1.3% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Lithgow: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 75–79 in Portland: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Lithgow: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Portland: 4.7% males, 3.7% females
- 65–69 in Lithgow: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 65–69 in Portland: 3.4% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Lithgow: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Portland: 4.1% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Lithgow: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Portland: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Lithgow: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Portland: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Lithgow: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Portland: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Lithgow: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Portland: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Lithgow: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Portland: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Lithgow: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Portland: 2.2% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Lithgow: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Lithgow: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Portland: 2.7% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Lithgow: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Portland: 2.8% males, 1.6% females
- 10–14 in Lithgow: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Portland: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Lithgow: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Portland: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Lithgow: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $424
- First area, 2016: $465
- First area, 2021: $595
- Second area, 2011: $423
- Second area, 2016: $778
- Second area, 2021: $521
- First area, 2011: $772
- First area, 2016: $820
- First area, 2021: $1,043
- Second area, 2011: $685
- Second area, 2016: $1,949
- Second area, 2021: $992
- First area, 2011: $961
- First area, 2016: $1,025
- First area, 2021: $1,460
- Second area, 2011: $992
- Second area, 2016: $2,126
- Second area, 2021: $1,413
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $270
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,183
- First area, 2021: $1,400
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,015
- Second area, 2021: $1,083
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Lithgow with nearby areas
Compare Portland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lithgow vs Portland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL113008/lithgow/vs/UCL115121/portland