Compare
Blue Mountains vs Lithgow
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 37 km apart · Blue Mountains profile · Lithgow profile
Blue Mountains Lithgow
Blue Mountains and Lithgow are nearby New South Wales areas with very different social and economic profiles. Blue Mountains has a much more highly qualified workforce, with 32.8% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 10.7% in Lithgow. This is consistent with a higher number of professionals and a higher typical weekly household income of $1,442, whereas Lithgow's typical household earns $1,043. Working patterns also differ sharply; 35.1% of people in Blue Mountains work from home, which is far higher than the 9.7% in Lithgow.
Both areas share a similar age profile, with a typical resident being 47 years old. They also have almost identical shares of children under 15 and people who speak little or no English. While they share these basic traits, the gaps between them have often grown since 2011. For example, the difference in the share of people with no religion has widened to 16.4 percentage points, and the gap in typical weekly household income has increased to $399.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 20,013
- First area, 2016: 29,319
- First area, 2021: 30,049
- Second area, 2011: 16,598
- Second area, 2016: 10,648
- Second area, 2021: 11,197
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Blue Mountains: 0.8% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Lithgow: 1.2% males, 2.2% females
- 80–84 in Blue Mountains: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Lithgow: 1.6% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Blue Mountains: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Lithgow: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 70–74 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 70–74 in Lithgow: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Blue Mountains: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 65–69 in Lithgow: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Blue Mountains: 3.7% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Lithgow: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Lithgow: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Lithgow: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Blue Mountains: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Lithgow: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Blue Mountains: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Lithgow: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Blue Mountains: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Lithgow: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 30–34 in Blue Mountains: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Lithgow: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Blue Mountains: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 25–29 in Lithgow: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 20–24 in Blue Mountains: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Lithgow: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Blue Mountains: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Lithgow: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Blue Mountains: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Lithgow: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Blue Mountains: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Lithgow: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Blue Mountains: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Lithgow: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $443
- First area, 2016: $610
- First area, 2021: $728
- Second area, 2011: $424
- Second area, 2016: $465
- Second area, 2021: $595
- First area, 2011: $933
- First area, 2016: $1,219
- First area, 2021: $1,442
- Second area, 2011: $772
- Second area, 2016: $820
- Second area, 2021: $1,043
- First area, 2011: $1,174
- First area, 2016: $1,587
- First area, 2021: $1,967
- Second area, 2011: $961
- Second area, 2016: $1,025
- Second area, 2021: $1,460
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $330
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2016: $230
- Second area, 2021: $270
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $1,711
- First area, 2021: $1,900
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,183
- Second area, 2021: $1,400
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Blue Mountains with nearby areas
Compare Lithgow with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains vs Lithgow [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL112003/blue-mountains/vs/UCL113008/lithgow