Compare
Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality
Section of State comparison ≈ 844 km apart · Rural Balance profile · Bounded Locality profile
Rural Balance Bounded Locality
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are very different in how people live and move. Rural Balance is dominated by larger homes, with 85% having three or more bedrooms, and it is a hub for remote work, where 21.5% of people work from home. In contrast, Bounded Locality is far more walkable; 51% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to just 6.7% in Rural Balance. Bounded Locality also has a higher share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents at 6% and a larger proportion of people living alone at 30.2%.
Income gaps between the two have widened since 2011, with the typical household income in Rural Balance now $471 higher than in Bounded Locality. Despite this, they share similar levels of university education and the same typical weekly rent of $250. Both areas also have very low rates of public transport use for commuting, and the proportion of people using a language other than English at home is low and similar in both places.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 398,717
- First area, 2016: 414,055
- First area, 2021: 428,903
- Second area, 2011: 32,926
- Second area, 2016: 31,013
- Second area, 2021: 31,196
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.7% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Bounded Locality: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Rural Balance: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.4% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.5% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.6% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Rural Balance: 4.0% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Rural Balance: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $521
- First area, 2016: $615
- First area, 2021: $752
- Second area, 2011: $456
- Second area, 2016: $523
- Second area, 2021: $634
- First area, 2011: $1,117
- First area, 2016: $1,328
- First area, 2021: $1,659
- Second area, 2011: $868
- Second area, 2016: $1,011
- Second area, 2021: $1,188
- First area, 2011: $1,317
- First area, 2016: $1,555
- First area, 2021: $1,978
- Second area, 2011: $1,090
- Second area, 2016: $1,290
- Second area, 2021: $1,547
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $180
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,408
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,603
- Second area, 2011: $1,190
- Second area, 2016: $1,161
- Second area, 2021: $1,236
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS23/rural-balance/vs/SOS62/bounded-locality