Compare
Lajamanu vs Pigeon Hole
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 205 km apart · Lajamanu profile · Pigeon Hole profile
Lajamanu Pigeon Hole
Lajamanu and Pigeon Hole are both remote Northern Territory areas with high First Nations populations. Lajamanu is larger and more central, with a typical resident being more likely to live in a de facto relationship (34.6%) and a higher share of one-parent families (30.0%). It has better local access, with 100% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and a walkability score of 3.2 (mostly car-dependent). In contrast, Pigeon Hole is more car-dependent (1.2) and has a much higher unemployment rate of 51.6%, compared to 12.8% in Lajamanu.
Both areas share a very similar proportion of children under 15, sitting at around 36%, which is higher than the national figure. They are also alike in their housing, with an average of 4.9 people per home and no homes owned outright. While Lajamanu has more people using another language at home (91.8%) than Pigeon Hole (81.0%), both areas stand far above the national average for language diversity.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 656
- First area, 2016: 606
- First area, 2021: 655
- Second area, 2011: 126
- Second area, 2016: 120
- Second area, 2021: 121
- First area, 2011: 21 yrs
- First area, 2016: 22 yrs
- First area, 2021: 21 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 13 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 23 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 23 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lajamanu: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Pigeon Hole: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Lajamanu: 0.0% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Pigeon Hole: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Lajamanu: 0.0% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Pigeon Hole: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Lajamanu: 0.0% males, 0.6% females; 70–74 in Pigeon Hole: 0.0% males, 4.7% females
- 65–69 in Lajamanu: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 65–69 in Pigeon Hole: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Lajamanu: 0.5% males, 1.7% females; 60–64 in Pigeon Hole: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Lajamanu: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 55–59 in Pigeon Hole: 3.9% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Lajamanu: 1.9% males, 1.4% females; 50–54 in Pigeon Hole: 6.3% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Lajamanu: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 45–49 in Pigeon Hole: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Lajamanu: 2.5% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Pigeon Hole: 3.1% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Lajamanu: 3.1% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Pigeon Hole: 0.0% males, 4.7% females
- 30–34 in Lajamanu: 2.9% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Pigeon Hole: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Lajamanu: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 25–29 in Pigeon Hole: 4.7% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Lajamanu: 5.7% males, 4.8% females; 20–24 in Pigeon Hole: 3.1% males, 9.4% females
- 15–19 in Lajamanu: 5.2% males, 5.2% females; 15–19 in Pigeon Hole: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Lajamanu: 5.4% males, 7.3% females; 10–14 in Pigeon Hole: 2.3% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Lajamanu: 5.7% males, 4.9% females; 5–9 in Pigeon Hole: 7.8% males, 9.4% females
- 0–4 in Lajamanu: 7.1% males, 6.0% females; 0–4 in Pigeon Hole: 7.8% males, 7.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $253
- First area, 2016: $262
- First area, 2021: $196
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $252
- Second area, 2021: $267
- First area, 2011: $1,166
- First area, 2016: $936
- First area, 2021: $1,034
- Second area, 2011: $900
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,124
- First area, 2011: $544
- First area, 2016: $612
- First area, 2021: $438
- Second area, 2011: $949
- Second area, 2016: $725
- Second area, 2021: $575
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 4.5
- First area, 2016: 4.5
- First area, 2021: 4.9
- Second area, 2011: 4.7
- Second area, 2016: 4.5
- Second area, 2021: 4.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $20
- First area, 2016: $100
- First area, 2021: $70
- Second area, 2011: $31
- Second area, 2016: $25
- Second area, 2021: $90
- First area, 2011: 1.80
- First area, 2016: 1.40
- First area, 2021: 1.60
- Second area, 2011: 2.50
- Second area, 2016: 2.20
- Second area, 2021: 1.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Lajamanu with nearby areas
Compare Pigeon Hole with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lajamanu vs Pigeon Hole [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL70152/lajamanu/vs/SAL70223/pigeon-hole