Compare
Neika vs Ridgeway
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.0 km apart · Neika profile · Ridgeway profile
Neika Ridgeway
Ridgeway and Neika are neighbouring Tasmanian areas with similar population sizes, though they differ sharply in wealth and demographics. Ridgeway is far more affluent, with 49.3% of households earning $3,000 or more a week compared to 15.4% in Neika. It is also a much younger place for families, with children under 15 making up 29.7% of the population, whereas they account for just 12.5% in Neika. Ridgeway is more diverse, with a far higher share of people born overseas (22.1% versus 12.0%) and more residents who use a language other than English at home.
Daily life in both areas shares several commonalities, such as a similar proportion of people with no religion (around 65%) and a similar share of three-bedroom homes. They are also both heavily reliant on cars, as no one in either area has a home without a motor vehicle. Despite these similarities, the two areas have tracked differently since 2011; Ridgeway has seen far more people move in over the last five years, while Neika has remained more stable.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 217
- First area, 2016: 198
- First area, 2021: 200
- Second area, 2011: 168
- Second area, 2016: 175
- Second area, 2021: 222
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Neika: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Ridgeway: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Neika: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Ridgeway: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Neika: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Ridgeway: 1.3% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Neika: 4.7% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Ridgeway: 3.8% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Neika: 5.2% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Ridgeway: 3.0% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Neika: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Ridgeway: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 55–59 in Neika: 7.3% males, 5.2% females; 55–59 in Ridgeway: 2.1% males, 4.3% females
- 50–54 in Neika: 2.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Ridgeway: 4.7% males, 5.1% females
- 45–49 in Neika: 2.6% males, 5.7% females; 45–49 in Ridgeway: 2.6% males, 4.7% females
- 40–44 in Neika: 5.7% males, 1.6% females; 40–44 in Ridgeway: 4.3% males, 5.1% females
- 35–39 in Neika: 1.6% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Ridgeway: 0.0% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Neika: 6.7% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Ridgeway: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 25–29 in Neika: 2.6% males, 5.2% females; 25–29 in Ridgeway: 2.1% males, 1.3% females
- 20–24 in Neika: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Ridgeway: 1.3% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Neika: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 15–19 in Ridgeway: 3.4% males, 1.3% females
- 10–14 in Neika: 5.7% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Ridgeway: 9.8% males, 6.0% females
- 5–9 in Neika: 1.6% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Ridgeway: 7.3% males, 6.0% females
- 0–4 in Neika: 2.6% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Ridgeway: 3.4% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $610
- First area, 2016: $703
- First area, 2021: $827
- Second area, 2011: $871
- Second area, 2016: $1,071
- Second area, 2021: $1,205
- First area, 2011: $1,199
- First area, 2016: $1,271
- First area, 2021: $1,666
- Second area, 2011: $2,324
- Second area, 2016: $2,272
- Second area, 2021: $2,555
- First area, 2011: $1,218
- First area, 2016: $1,624
- First area, 2021: $1,875
- Second area, 2011: $2,192
- Second area, 2016: $2,542
- Second area, 2021: $2,750
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $155
- First area, 2016: $153
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $100
- Second area, 2016: $283
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,509
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,314
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,600
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Neika with nearby areas
Compare Ridgeway with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Neika vs Ridgeway [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60448/neika/vs/SAL60552/ridgeway