Compare
Kingston vs Neika
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.6 km apart · Kingston profile · Neika profile
Kingston Neika
Kingston (Tas.) and Neika are neighbouring areas with very different characters. Kingston (Tas.) is a larger, more diverse hub where 26.6% of people were born overseas and 18.6% use another language at home. It is more accessible, with a walkability score of 5.7 (somewhat walkable), whereas Neika is car-dependent with a score of 0.1. In contrast, Neika has a much older population, with a typical resident aged 45 compared to 36 in Kingston (Tas.). Neika also has a more highly qualified workforce, as 44% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 33.1% in Kingston (Tas.).
Everyday life in both places shares some similarities, such as having about 2.5 people per home and very similar typical weekly family incomes. They also have almost the same share of people aged 65 and over. However, the two areas are drifting apart in other ways. The gap in overseas arrivals is stark, as 20.4% of people in Kingston (Tas.) arrived recently, while Neika has had none.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,760
- First area, 2016: 10,409
- First area, 2021: 12,288
- Second area, 2011: 217
- Second area, 2016: 198
- Second area, 2021: 200
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kingston: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Neika: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Kingston: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Neika: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Kingston: 1.5% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Neika: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Kingston: 2.1% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Neika: 4.7% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Kingston: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Neika: 5.2% males, 3.6% females
- 60–64 in Kingston: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Neika: 3.1% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Kingston: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Neika: 7.3% males, 5.2% females
- 50–54 in Kingston: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Neika: 2.6% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Kingston: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Neika: 2.6% males, 5.7% females
- 40–44 in Kingston: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Neika: 5.7% males, 1.6% females
- 35–39 in Kingston: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Neika: 1.6% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Kingston: 4.2% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Neika: 6.7% males, 1.6% females
- 25–29 in Kingston: 4.7% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in Neika: 2.6% males, 5.2% females
- 20–24 in Kingston: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Neika: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Kingston: 3.1% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Neika: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 10–14 in Kingston: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Neika: 5.7% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Kingston: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Neika: 1.6% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Kingston: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Neika: 2.6% males, 1.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $568
- First area, 2016: $633
- First area, 2021: $751
- Second area, 2011: $610
- Second area, 2016: $703
- Second area, 2021: $827
- First area, 2011: $1,117
- First area, 2016: $1,232
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,199
- Second area, 2016: $1,271
- Second area, 2021: $1,666
- First area, 2011: $1,441
- First area, 2016: $1,597
- First area, 2021: $1,892
- Second area, 2011: $1,218
- Second area, 2016: $1,624
- Second area, 2021: $1,875
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $265
- First area, 2016: $295
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $155
- Second area, 2016: $153
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,560
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,509
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,314
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kingston with nearby areas
Compare Neika with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kingston vs Neika [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60307/kingston/vs/SAL60448/neika