Compare
Emu Heights vs Upper Burnie
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.8 km apart · Emu Heights profile · Upper Burnie profile
Emu Heights Upper Burnie
Upper Burnie and Emu Heights (Tas.) are neighbouring areas with very different layouts and populations. Upper Burnie is a very walkable area where many people live alone (45.1%) and 24.2% are seniors. It has a higher share of renters (39.4%) and many more homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (95.4% compared to 0.0% in Emu Heights (Tas.)). Emu Heights (Tas.) is mostly car-dependent and more residential, with 100% of homes being separate houses and a much higher share of homes having three or more bedrooms (84.4%).
Both areas share a similar proportion of children under 15, sitting around 17%. They also have almost identical typical weekly family incomes, both around $1,300 to $1,400. While Upper Burnie is more connected for pedestrians, Emu Heights (Tas.) has seen a far higher share of adults working or looking for work (65.5% compared to 49.3%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 209
- First area, 2016: 180
- First area, 2021: 182
- Second area, 2011: 1,761
- Second area, 2016: 1,821
- Second area, 2021: 1,891
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emu Heights: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Upper Burnie: 0.9% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Emu Heights: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Upper Burnie: 1.8% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Emu Heights: 1.8% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Upper Burnie: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
- 70–74 in Emu Heights: 3.0% males, 4.3% females; 70–74 in Upper Burnie: 2.5% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Emu Heights: 0.0% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Upper Burnie: 2.6% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Emu Heights: 2.4% males, 4.9% females; 60–64 in Upper Burnie: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Emu Heights: 2.4% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Upper Burnie: 2.5% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Emu Heights: 3.7% males, 5.5% females; 50–54 in Upper Burnie: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 45–49 in Emu Heights: 2.4% males, 7.3% females; 45–49 in Upper Burnie: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in Emu Heights: 4.9% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Upper Burnie: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Emu Heights: 2.4% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Upper Burnie: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Emu Heights: 4.9% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Upper Burnie: 2.3% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Emu Heights: 3.0% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in Upper Burnie: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 20–24 in Emu Heights: 1.8% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Upper Burnie: 2.4% males, 3.5% females
- 15–19 in Emu Heights: 3.0% males, 1.8% females; 15–19 in Upper Burnie: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Emu Heights: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Upper Burnie: 3.1% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Emu Heights: 4.3% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Upper Burnie: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Emu Heights: 4.9% males, 1.8% females; 0–4 in Upper Burnie: 3.1% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $486
- First area, 2016: $718
- First area, 2021: $662
- Second area, 2011: $414
- Second area, 2016: $497
- Second area, 2021: $572
- First area, 2011: $945
- First area, 2016: $1,142
- First area, 2021: $1,178
- Second area, 2011: $689
- Second area, 2016: $776
- Second area, 2021: $912
- First area, 2011: $1,125
- First area, 2016: $1,333
- First area, 2021: $1,343
- Second area, 2011: $937
- Second area, 2016: $1,190
- Second area, 2021: $1,392
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $200
- First area, 2016: $210
- First area, 2021: $256
- Second area, 2011: $150
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $230
- First area, 2011: $867
- First area, 2016: $893
- First area, 2021: $867
- Second area, 2011: $1,094
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,057
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emu Heights with nearby areas
Compare Upper Burnie with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emu Heights vs Upper Burnie [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60190/emu-heights/vs/SAL60705/upper-burnie