Compare
Burnie vs Emu Heights
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.8 km apart · Burnie profile · Emu Heights profile
Burnie Emu Heights
Burnie and Emu Heights (Tas.) are neighbouring areas with very different layouts. Burnie is a walker's paradise where 50.6% of homes are rented and the typical resident is more likely to have a bachelor degree (26.7%). It has a far higher share of older people, with 22.2% aged 65 and over. In contrast, Emu Heights (Tas.) is mostly car-dependent and consists entirely of separate houses. It has a younger feel, with 17.6% of the population being children under 15, and a far higher share of families where 32.4% of adults provide unpaid childcare.
Both areas share a very similar typical weekly personal income, sitting around $660 to $710. They also have the same drive time to the city and both are entirely within walking distance of a park. While they are similar in these respects, the gap in housing types has remained wide, with Emu Heights (Tas.) far more likely to have homes with three or more bedrooms (84.4%) compared to Burnie (50.3%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 696
- First area, 2016: 596
- First area, 2021: 693
- Second area, 2011: 209
- Second area, 2016: 180
- Second area, 2021: 182
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Burnie: 1.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Emu Heights: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Burnie: 1.0% males, 2.9% females; 80–84 in Emu Heights: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Burnie: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Emu Heights: 1.8% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Burnie: 3.3% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Emu Heights: 3.0% males, 4.3% females
- 65–69 in Burnie: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Emu Heights: 0.0% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Burnie: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in Emu Heights: 2.4% males, 4.9% females
- 55–59 in Burnie: 2.0% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Emu Heights: 2.4% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Burnie: 3.9% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Emu Heights: 3.7% males, 5.5% females
- 45–49 in Burnie: 1.7% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Emu Heights: 2.4% males, 7.3% females
- 40–44 in Burnie: 2.6% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Emu Heights: 4.9% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Burnie: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Emu Heights: 2.4% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Burnie: 3.4% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Emu Heights: 4.9% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Burnie: 4.6% males, 5.0% females; 25–29 in Emu Heights: 3.0% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Burnie: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Emu Heights: 1.8% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Burnie: 3.2% males, 1.7% females; 15–19 in Emu Heights: 3.0% males, 1.8% females
- 10–14 in Burnie: 1.9% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Emu Heights: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Burnie: 1.0% males, 1.7% females; 5–9 in Emu Heights: 4.3% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Burnie: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Emu Heights: 4.9% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $533
- First area, 2016: $642
- First area, 2021: $710
- Second area, 2011: $486
- Second area, 2016: $718
- Second area, 2021: $662
- First area, 2011: $826
- First area, 2016: $937
- First area, 2021: $1,064
- Second area, 2011: $945
- Second area, 2016: $1,142
- Second area, 2021: $1,178
- First area, 2011: $1,191
- First area, 2016: $1,460
- First area, 2021: $1,687
- Second area, 2011: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $1,333
- Second area, 2021: $1,343
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 1.8
- First area, 2016: 1.7
- First area, 2021: 1.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $170
- First area, 2016: $180
- First area, 2021: $240
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $210
- Second area, 2021: $256
- First area, 2011: $1,248
- First area, 2016: $1,114
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $867
- Second area, 2016: $893
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Burnie with nearby areas
Compare Emu Heights with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Burnie vs Emu Heights [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60084/burnie/vs/SAL60190/emu-heights