Compare
Acacia Hills vs Barrington
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.2 km apart · Acacia Hills profile · Barrington profile
Acacia Hills Barrington
Acacia Hills (Tas.) and Barrington (Tas.) are neighbouring rural areas with very different demographics. Acacia Hills (Tas.) is much younger, with a typical resident aged 41 compared to 53 in Barrington (Tas.). This age gap is reflected in the families living there; Acacia Hills (Tas.) has a well higher share of children under 15 (17.7%) and far more people caring for children unpaid (29.0% against 16.1%). While the typical family income is well higher in Acacia Hills (Tas.) at $2,122 a week, Barrington (Tas.) has a much higher share of homes owned outright (55.0%).
These differences are becoming more pronounced, as the gap in the number of people who moved to the area in the last five years has widened to 10 percentage points. Despite these contrasting trends, the two areas share several characteristics. Both have about the same share of adults with a bachelor degree (around 13%) and very similar housing styles, with nearly 88% of homes having three or more bedrooms. In both places, it is very rare for households to not have a motor vehicle.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 411
- First area, 2016: 623
- First area, 2021: 729
- Second area, 2011: 432
- Second area, 2016: 197
- Second area, 2021: 209
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 53 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Acacia Hills: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Barrington: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Acacia Hills: 0.7% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Barrington: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Acacia Hills: 1.0% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Barrington: 3.6% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Acacia Hills: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Barrington: 1.5% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Acacia Hills: 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Barrington: 4.1% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Acacia Hills: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Barrington: 8.2% males, 7.2% females
- 55–59 in Acacia Hills: 4.6% males, 5.3% females; 55–59 in Barrington: 4.1% males, 7.2% females
- 50–54 in Acacia Hills: 4.2% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Barrington: 7.7% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Acacia Hills: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Barrington: 2.6% males, 4.6% females
- 40–44 in Acacia Hills: 2.7% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Barrington: 3.6% males, 4.6% females
- 35–39 in Acacia Hills: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Barrington: 0.0% males, 1.5% females
- 30–34 in Acacia Hills: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Barrington: 5.1% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Acacia Hills: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Barrington: 3.6% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Acacia Hills: 3.0% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Barrington: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Acacia Hills: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Barrington: 0.0% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Acacia Hills: 3.4% males, 4.2% females; 10–14 in Barrington: 1.5% males, 2.1% females
- 5–9 in Acacia Hills: 3.1% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Barrington: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Acacia Hills: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Barrington: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $527
- First area, 2016: $640
- First area, 2021: $816
- Second area, 2011: $398
- Second area, 2016: $479
- Second area, 2021: $755
- First area, 2011: $1,286
- First area, 2016: $1,284
- First area, 2021: $1,842
- Second area, 2011: $926
- Second area, 2016: $1,156
- Second area, 2021: $1,611
- First area, 2011: $1,424
- First area, 2016: $1,397
- First area, 2021: $2,122
- Second area, 2011: $1,050
- Second area, 2016: $1,213
- Second area, 2021: $1,642
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $260
- First area, 2016: $285
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $210
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,430
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,257
- Second area, 2016: $875
- Second area, 2021: $1,100
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Acacia Hills with nearby areas
Compare Barrington with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Acacia Hills vs Barrington [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60004/acacia-hills/vs/SAL60032/barrington