Compare
Camillo vs Mount Nasura
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.5 km apart · Camillo profile · Mount Nasura profile
Camillo Mount Nasura
Camillo and Mount Nasura are neighbouring areas with different social and transport profiles. Camillo is a very walkable area where almost every home is within a 15-minute walk of a school, and 77.2% are near groceries. It has more one-parent families (23.8%) and a younger typical age of 37. In contrast, Mount Nasura is somewhat walkable and has a noticeably older typical resident (44). It has a higher share of high-earners, with 20.5% of households making $3,000 or more a week, compared to 7.5% in Camillo.
While both areas share similar house sizes and transit times to the city, the gap in home ownership is widening. Mount Nasura has a much higher rate of homes owned outright (37.5%) compared to Camillo (26.9%). This contrast is reflected in the rental market, where renting is far more common in Camillo. Both areas have a higher proportion of people born overseas than the national figure, though they differ in other ways, such as Camillo having a well higher First Nations population.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,570
- First area, 2016: 4,408
- First area, 2021: 4,442
- Second area, 2011: 2,983
- Second area, 2016: 2,983
- Second area, 2021: 2,997
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Camillo: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Mount Nasura: 1.0% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Camillo: 0.6% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Mount Nasura: 1.5% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Camillo: 1.6% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Mount Nasura: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Camillo: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Mount Nasura: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Camillo: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Mount Nasura: 3.4% males, 3.9% females
- 60–64 in Camillo: 2.9% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Mount Nasura: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Camillo: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Mount Nasura: 3.7% males, 4.3% females
- 50–54 in Camillo: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Mount Nasura: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Camillo: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Mount Nasura: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Camillo: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Mount Nasura: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Camillo: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Mount Nasura: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Camillo: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Mount Nasura: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Camillo: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Mount Nasura: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Camillo: 3.4% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Mount Nasura: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Camillo: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Mount Nasura: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Camillo: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Mount Nasura: 2.9% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Camillo: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Mount Nasura: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Camillo: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Mount Nasura: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $566
- First area, 2016: $564
- First area, 2021: $610
- Second area, 2011: $635
- Second area, 2016: $669
- Second area, 2021: $772
- First area, 2011: $1,105
- First area, 2016: $1,209
- First area, 2021: $1,279
- Second area, 2011: $1,577
- Second area, 2016: $1,593
- Second area, 2021: $1,752
- First area, 2011: $1,221
- First area, 2016: $1,354
- First area, 2021: $1,475
- Second area, 2011: $1,780
- Second area, 2016: $1,771
- Second area, 2021: $2,023
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $285
- First area, 2016: $310
- First area, 2021: $280
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $340
- Second area, 2021: $345
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,481
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,700
- Second area, 2016: $1,800
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Camillo with nearby areas
Compare Mount Nasura with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Camillo vs Mount Nasura [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL50240/camillo/vs/SAL51026/mount-nasura