Compare
Port Lincoln vs Tulka
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.6 km apart · Port Lincoln profile · Tulka profile
Port Lincoln Tulka
Port Lincoln and Tulka are neighbouring South Australian areas with very different scales and lifestyles. Port Lincoln is a larger centre where 33.8% of households rent and the walkability score is somewhat walkable (4.2). In contrast, Tulka is sparsely populated and car-dependent (0.7), with far more homes owned outright at 50.0%. Port Lincoln also has a much higher share of seniors, with 21.2% aged 65 and over, and a larger First Nations population at 6.5%.
These two areas have tracked closely since 2011 in several key ways, maintaining very similar typical weekly incomes of $717 in Port Lincoln and $756 in Tulka. They also share a similar number of people per home, averaging around 2.2 to 2.3. While Port Lincoln has far more public transport stops and shops within a short walk, both areas sit near the national figure for the proportion of people who speak little or no English.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 14,088
- First area, 2016: 14,120
- First area, 2021: 14,458
- Second area, 2011: 171
- Second area, 2016: 126
- Second area, 2021: 126
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Lincoln: 1.2% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Tulka: 3.7% males, 2.8% females
- 80–84 in Port Lincoln: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Tulka: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Port Lincoln: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Tulka: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Port Lincoln: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Tulka: 0.0% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Tulka: 5.6% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Tulka: 8.3% males, 7.4% females
- 55–59 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Tulka: 5.6% males, 9.3% females
- 50–54 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Tulka: 7.4% males, 9.3% females
- 45–49 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Tulka: 0.0% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Port Lincoln: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Tulka: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Tulka: 4.6% males, 5.6% females
- 30–34 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Tulka: 0.0% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Tulka: 4.6% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Port Lincoln: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Tulka: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Tulka: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Tulka: 3.7% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Tulka: 6.5% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Tulka: 2.8% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $523
- First area, 2016: $603
- First area, 2021: $717
- Second area, 2011: $633
- Second area, 2016: $658
- Second area, 2021: $756
- First area, 2011: $924
- First area, 2016: $1,082
- First area, 2021: $1,243
- Second area, 2011: $937
- Second area, 2016: $1,270
- Second area, 2021: $1,343
- First area, 2011: $1,203
- First area, 2016: $1,399
- First area, 2021: $1,668
- Second area, 2011: $1,325
- Second area, 2016: $1,624
- Second area, 2021: $1,875
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $180
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $240
- Second area, 2011: $130
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,313
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,679
- Second area, 2021: $1,279
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Port Lincoln with nearby areas
Compare Tulka with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Lincoln vs Tulka [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL41201/port-lincoln/vs/SAL41475/tulka