Compare
Duck Ponds vs Port Lincoln
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 8.5 km apart · Duck Ponds profile · Port Lincoln profile
Duck Ponds Port Lincoln
Port Lincoln and Duck Ponds are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Port Lincoln is much larger and more mobile, with 36.0% of people moving there in the last five years and 11.6% arriving from overseas. It has a higher share of people with no religion (51.2%) and more people who finished Year 12 (41.5%). Duck Ponds is sparsely populated and more residential, where every home is a separate detached house and 47.4% are owned outright. First Nations residents in Duck Ponds are far older, with a typical age of 40 compared to 22 in Port Lincoln, and they earn a much higher typical personal income of $899.
These two areas have tracked differently since 2011, particularly regarding crime, where Duck Ponds saw a much higher increase in the crime rate. Despite these shifts, they share some core similarities, such as having nearly the same proportion of people born overseas (around 8.5% to 8.8%). They also have a very similar typical weekly household income, with Port Lincoln at $1,243 and Duck Ponds at $1,281.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 272
- First area, 2016: 289
- First area, 2021: 284
- Second area, 2011: 14,088
- Second area, 2016: 14,120
- Second area, 2021: 14,458
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Duck Ponds: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Port Lincoln: 1.2% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Duck Ponds: 1.7% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Port Lincoln: 1.2% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Duck Ponds: 3.1% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Port Lincoln: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Duck Ponds: 3.5% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Port Lincoln: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Duck Ponds: 5.9% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Duck Ponds: 5.9% males, 1.4% females; 60–64 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Duck Ponds: 8.7% males, 1.4% females; 55–59 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Duck Ponds: 9.0% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Duck Ponds: 9.3% males, 1.4% females; 45–49 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Duck Ponds: 10.7% males, 2.1% females; 40–44 in Port Lincoln: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Duck Ponds: 5.2% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Duck Ponds: 5.9% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Duck Ponds: 5.5% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Duck Ponds: 3.8% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Port Lincoln: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Duck Ponds: 1.7% males, 1.0% females; 15–19 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Duck Ponds: 1.7% males, 1.4% females; 10–14 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Duck Ponds: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Duck Ponds: 1.4% males, 1.0% females; 0–4 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $587
- First area, 2016: $583
- First area, 2021: $634
- Second area, 2011: $523
- Second area, 2016: $603
- Second area, 2021: $717
- First area, 2011: $1,062
- First area, 2016: $1,138
- First area, 2021: $1,281
- Second area, 2011: $924
- Second area, 2016: $1,082
- Second area, 2021: $1,243
- First area, 2011: $1,291
- First area, 2016: $1,125
- First area, 2021: $1,524
- Second area, 2011: $1,203
- Second area, 2016: $1,399
- Second area, 2021: $1,668
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $50
- First area, 2016: $160
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $180
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,019
- First area, 2021: $1,885
- Second area, 2011: $1,313
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.60
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Duck Ponds with nearby areas
Compare Port Lincoln with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Duck Ponds vs Port Lincoln [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40375/duck-ponds/vs/SAL41201/port-lincoln