Compare
Littlehampton vs Mount Barker Summit
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.8 km apart · Littlehampton profile · Mount Barker Summit profile
Littlehampton Mount Barker Summit
Littlehampton and Mount Barker Summit are neighbouring areas in South Australia with very different residential profiles. Littlehampton is a larger community where the typical resident is 40, while Mount Barker Summit is sparsely populated and far older, with a typical age of 50. There are stark differences in how people live and move; for example, 32.4% of people in Mount Barker Summit live alone compared to just 16.5% in Littlehampton. Littlehampton is somewhat walkable and has a higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of schools (80.8%) and groceries (79.2%), whereas Mount Barker Summit is car-dependent and lacks these nearby amenities.
Both areas sit near the national figure for people aged 65 and over, with Littlehampton at 17.1% and Mount Barker Summit at 25.0%. They are also very similar in terms of typical family income, with Littlehampton at $2,283 and Mount Barker Summit at $2,187 per week. While they share a similar typical number of people per home, the way they work differs; 31.5% of people in Mount Barker Summit work from home, which is far higher than the 11.3% in Littlehampton.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,748
- First area, 2016: 3,044
- First area, 2021: 3,300
- Second area, 2016: 102
- Second area, 2021: 100
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 50 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Littlehampton: 0.7% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Mount Barker Summit: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Littlehampton: 0.7% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Mount Barker Summit: 4.1% males, 4.1% females
- 75–79 in Littlehampton: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Mount Barker Summit: 5.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Littlehampton: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Mount Barker Summit: 3.3% males, 2.5% females
- 65–69 in Littlehampton: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Mount Barker Summit: 6.6% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Littlehampton: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Mount Barker Summit: 2.5% males, 5.0% females
- 55–59 in Littlehampton: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Mount Barker Summit: 4.1% males, 5.8% females
- 50–54 in Littlehampton: 3.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Mount Barker Summit: 9.1% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Littlehampton: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Mount Barker Summit: 4.1% males, 2.5% females
- 40–44 in Littlehampton: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Mount Barker Summit: 0.0% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Littlehampton: 2.7% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Mount Barker Summit: 0.0% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Littlehampton: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Barker Summit: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Littlehampton: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Barker Summit: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Littlehampton: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Mount Barker Summit: 2.5% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Littlehampton: 3.7% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Mount Barker Summit: 2.5% males, 5.0% females
- 10–14 in Littlehampton: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Mount Barker Summit: 5.8% males, 2.5% females
- 5–9 in Littlehampton: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Mount Barker Summit: 4.1% males, 5.8% females
- 0–4 in Littlehampton: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Mount Barker Summit: 2.5% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $659
- First area, 2016: $739
- First area, 2021: $886
- Second area, 2016: $567
- Second area, 2021: $640
- First area, 2011: $1,545
- First area, 2016: $1,741
- First area, 2021: $2,086
- Second area, 2016: $1,374
- Second area, 2021: $1,625
- First area, 2011: $1,735
- First area, 2016: $1,986
- First area, 2021: $2,283
- Second area, 2016: $1,899
- Second area, 2021: $2,187
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $290
- First area, 2016: $330
- First area, 2021: $360
- Second area, 2021: $335
- First area, 2011: $1,683
- First area, 2016: $1,647
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $2,200
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Littlehampton with nearby areas
Compare Mount Barker Summit with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Littlehampton vs Mount Barker Summit [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40770/littlehampton/vs/SAL40935/mount-barker-summit